Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):455.
doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02830-0.

Effectiveness of a new thermal insulation blanket in the control of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia and comfort: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effectiveness of a new thermal insulation blanket in the control of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia and comfort: a randomized controlled trial

Isaura Carvalho et al. BMC Anesthesiol. .

Abstract

Background: Disturbances in the thermoregulatory system can precipitate inadvertent hypothermia in patients undergoing surgeries lasting over 60 min, causing serious complications in the recovery process. Cutaneous thermal protection is relevant for the control of temperature of patients in the perioperative setting. The standard thermal protection widely utilized is an electric forced warm air blanket. This study compared a new layered textile blanket with the standard protection. The hypothesis posited that the textile blanket could provide cutaneous thermal protection comparable to that of the standard protection (forced-air warming blanket), in terms of temperature variation and safety.

Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted at a Portuguese orthopedic hospital from October 2018 to January 2019, comprising 124 adult patients undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty. Participants were randomly allocated to either the intervention group, receiving the textile blanket, or to the control group, receiving standard measures. Tympanic temperature, shivering, and thermal comfort perception were evaluated at six time points. Comfort dimensions and ergonomic aspects were also assessed. Parametric statistics were performed, and independent samples t-tests and repeated measures were used to compare temperature variations and thermal comfort.

Results: No statistically significant differences were found between groups in mean temperature variation, visual perception of thermal comfort, and thermal and perioperative comfort scales. The intervention group (n = 65) scored significantly higher in ergonomic evaluations compared to the control group (n = 59) for: fit to body and general comfort (p = 0.004), touch (p = 0.005), and feeling of comfort with the inner layer texture and shape (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The tested blanket had a comparable performance to the standard protection, suggesting it as a potential sustainable alternative to the recommended measures for thermal protection. However, further investigations across diverse contexts and populations are needed to validate these findings.

Keywords: Hypothermia; Perioperative care; Randomized controlled trial; Temperature; Thermal insulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The study protocol was approved by Ethics Committee of the Hospital da Prelada, Porto, Portugal under the code number “CEUOSSCMP/20.14”. Consent for publication: Non applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Heat redistribution [1]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Characteristic triphasic patterns of hypothermia under regional, general, or combined regional and general anesthesia [12]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Three-layered textile blanket
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
CONSORT flow diagram
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Repeated measures analysis of temperature

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sessler D, Perioperative Heat. Balance Anesthesiology. 2000;92:578–578. 10.1097/00000542-200002000-00042. - PubMed
    1. Abelha FJ, Castro MA, Neves AM, Landeiro NM, Santos CC. Hypothermia in a surgical intensive care unit. BMC Anesthesiol. 2005;5:1–10. 10.1186/1471-2253-5-7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Insler SR, Sessler DI. Perioperative Thermoregulation and temperature monitoring. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2006;24:823–37. 10.1016/j.atc.2006.09.001. - PubMed
    1. Poveda V, de B, Galvão CM. Hipotermia no período intra-operatório: é possível evitá-la? Rev Da Esc Enferm Da USP. 2011;45:411–7. 10.1590/S0080-62342011000200016. - PubMed
    1. Sessler D, Schroeder M, Merrifield B, Matsukama T. Optimal duration and temperature of prewarming. Anesthesiology. 1995;82:674–81. 10.1097/00000542-199503000-00009. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources