Cumulative incidence of chronic pain after visiting a Dutch emergency department with acute pain
- PMID: 39695981
- PMCID: PMC11658455
- DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02836-8
Cumulative incidence of chronic pain after visiting a Dutch emergency department with acute pain
Abstract
Background: Chronic pain is a substantial problem in modern healthcare resulting in health care overutilization. The cumulative incidence of developing chronic pain after visiting the emergency department with acute pain has been determined for specific patient groups only. If the cumulative incidence of chronic pain in emergency department patients with acute pain is high, more proactive measures are justified to limit development of chronic pain. The primary objective was to study the cumulative incidence of chronic pain in patients visiting Dutch emergency departments with acute pain. In addition, we compared the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and pain related interference with work.
Methods: In this prospective multicenter cohort study data was collected from adult patients visiting the emergency department with acute pain. Chronic pain was defined by means of a numeric rating scale (NRS) of ≥ 1 measured 90 days after the initial visit. HRQOL was measured with European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5 L) and Short Form (SF-36) questionnaires.
Results: 1906 patients were included of which 825 had complete data. Of these, 559 patients (67.8%; 95%CI: 64.5 - 70.9%) scored an NRS ≥ 1 after 90 days. Incidence with completed analyses (with imputed data) was similar. Patients with chronic pain reported a significantly lower HRQOL; EQ-5D-5 L index (median 0.82 vs. 1.00) and significantly more pain related hindrance (median 1.00 vs. 0.00).
Conclusions: 67.8% of the responders scored NRS ≥ 1 90 days after ED-visit with acute pain. Regardless of the used definition, chronic pain is associated with a lower HRQOL and more pain related hindrance.
Keywords: Acute pain; Chronic pain; Emergency service; Quality of life.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The Medical research ethics committee (METC, Protocol 2018-39) approved the study. Local approval was obtained by all participating centres and was conducted in accordance to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients provided written informed consent according to the procedure approved by the METC. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Berben SA, et al. Pain prevalence and pain relief in trauma patients in the Accident & Emergency department. Injury. 2008;39(5):578–85. - PubMed
-
- Cordell WH, et al. The high prevalence of pain in emergency medical care. Am J Emerg Med. 2002;20(3):165–9. - PubMed
-
- Gaakeer MI, et al. [Acute pain at the emergency department: better treatment required]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2011;155:A2241. - PubMed
-
- Tcherny-Lessenot S, et al. Management and relief of pain in an emergency department from the adult patients’ perspective. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2003;25(6):539–46. - PubMed
-
- Gupta A, et al. Evidence-based review of the pharmacoeconomics related to the management of chronic nonmalignant pain. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2010;24(2):152–6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
