Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):454.
doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02851-9.

Ramelteon exposure and survival of critically Ill sepsis patients: a retrospective study from MIMIC-IV

Affiliations

Ramelteon exposure and survival of critically Ill sepsis patients: a retrospective study from MIMIC-IV

Yun-Yang Han et al. BMC Anesthesiol. .

Abstract

Background: The effect of ramelteon, a melatonin receptor agonist, on survival in septic patients remains unknown. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to explore the relationship between ramelteon exposure and survival outcomes in septic patients.

Methods: Data from septic patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database, with patients categorized into ramelteon exposure and non-exposure groups based on the use of ramelteon. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality, and secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality, in-hospital mortality, length of ICU stay, and hospital stay. Propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were employed to address confounding variables. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression models for stepwise regression were utilized to assess the impact of ramelteon exposure on survival.

Results: This study included 22,152 unexposed patients and 2,708 exposed patients, resulting in 2,607 matched pairs after PSM. Following PSM, ramelteon exposure was associated with significantly lower in-hospital mortality (11.6% vs.19.7%, p < 0.001), 30-day mortality (13.4% vs. 23.2%, p < 0.001), and 90-day mortality (22.1% vs. 30%, p < 0.001).K-M curves demonstrated a significant difference in 30-day and 90-day mortality between the two groups (P < 0.001), irrespective of PSM application. Both PSM (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.53, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 0.47-0.61, p < 0.001) and IPTW models (HR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.50-0.70, p < 0.001) indicated a significant positive effect of ramelteon usage on 30-day mortality among septic patients compared to the non-exposure group.

Conclusions: This exploratory, retrospective study suggests an association between ramelteon exposure and reduced 30-day and 90-day mortality in septic patients compared with the non-exposure group. Considering the limitations of the retrospective design and the potential for unmeasured confounding, well-designed prospective studies and randomized controlled trials will be needed to confirm these findings.

Keywords: ICU; MIMIC-IV; Melatonin; Mortality; Ramelteon; Sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Authorization for this investigation was granted by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) institutional review boards, with informed consent waived. Database access was granted to a researcher (HYY) who completed the Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative test (name ID: 10112186, record ID: 42408105). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of patient selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan–Meier survival curves for the two groups. A p-value of < 0.0001 based on the log-rank test indicates a significant difference in 30-day and 90-day mortality between the ramelteon-exposed and unexposed groups (A, B), both before and after propensity score matching (C, D) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (E, F)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Subgroup analysis based on PSM cohort. A p value < 0.001 means that a significant difference the 30-day mortality between the two groups, and a p-value for interaction less than 0.05 indicates a potential interaction
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Sensitivity analysis for the severity scores based on PSM cohort. A p value < 0.001 means that a significant difference the 30-day mortality in different subgroups between ramelteon exposed and unexposed group

Similar articles

References

    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC. 2016;315(8):801–10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, Colombara DV, Ikuta KS, Kissoon N, Finfer S, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bauer M, Gerlach H, Vogelmann T, Preissing F, Stiefel J, Adam D. Mortality in sepsis and septic shock in Europe, North America and Australia between 2009 and 2019- results from a systematic review and meta-analysis. CRIT CARE. 2020;24(1):239. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu YC, Yao Y, Yu MM, Gao YL, Qi AL, Jiang TY, Chen ZS, Shou ST, Chai YF. Frequency and mortality of sepsis and septic shock in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC INFECT DIS. 2022;22(1):564. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shah AD, MacCallum NS, Harris S, Brealey DA, Palmer E, Hetherington J, Shi S, Perez-Suarez D, Ercole A, Watkinson PJ et al: Descriptors of Sepsis Using the Sepsis-3 Criteria: A Cohort Study in Critical Care Units Within the U.K. National Institute for Health Research Critical Care Health Informatics Collaborative. CRIT CARE MED 2021, 49(11):1883–1894. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources