Silicone stent versus fully covered metallic stent in tracheoesophageal fistula: a single-center retrospective study
- PMID: 39696272
- PMCID: PMC11657733
- DOI: 10.1186/s12890-024-03434-7
Silicone stent versus fully covered metallic stent in tracheoesophageal fistula: a single-center retrospective study
Abstract
Background: In cases of tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF), closure of the fistula by tracheal stent implantation is an effective treatment. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and complications of silicone and metallic tracheal stents for TEF.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent tracheal stent insertion for TEF between January 2021 and April 2024 at our institution. Complications were assessed bronchoscopically.
Results: Metallic stents were placed in 21 patients (18 men, 85.7%) and silicone stents in 17 patients (14 men, 82.4%). No differences were observed between the two groups in terms of age, gender, location or size of fistula, primary disease, symptoms or comorbidities. A total of 26 fistulas were found in the metallic stent group, and 19 fistulas were found in the silicone stent group. Stent insertion was successful in all cases. The differences in efficacy and complications after stent placement were not statistically significant between the two groups. Mucus retention was the most frequent complication (P = 0.221), followed by granulation tissue (38.1% with metallic stent and 29.4% with silicone; P = 0.734) and migration (14.3% with metallic stent and 29.4% with silicone; P = 0.426).
Conclusions: Silicone and metallic stents are viable clinical options for treating TEF. Both are equally effective and safe and have acceptable complication rates in TEF.
Keywords: Metallic stent; Silicone stent; Tracheal stent; Tracheoesophageal fistula.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This was a retrospective observational study using anonymous patient data. The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Jining No.1 People’s Hospital (No.2024-IIT-027). Contact with Prof. Cui-xia Bian, the corresponding author, via e-mail (yzbbc@126.com) is requested should any additional information be needed. All patients agreed and signed informed consent forms before stent deployment. Patients were not contacted or directly impacted by study participation, thus obtaining informed consent was not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures


References
-
- Wang H, Zhang N, Li D, Zou H, Zhang J, Luo L, et al. Airway Covered Metallic Stent Based on Different Fistula Location and Size in Malignant Tracheoesophageal Fistula. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 2015;350:364–8. - PubMed
-
- Sökücü SN, Özdemir C, Tural Önür S, Dalar L, Altın S. Comparison of silicon and metallic bifurcated stents in patients with malignant airway lesions. Clinical Respiratory J. 2020;14:198–204. - PubMed
-
- Dutau H, Toutblanc B, Lamb C, Seijo L. Use of the Dumon Y-stent in the Management of Malignant Disease Involving the Carina. Chest. 2004;126:951–8. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources