Fresh whole blood: A feasible alternative in disasters and mass casualty incidents? a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 39696472
- PMCID: PMC11656982
- DOI: 10.1186/s13031-024-00635-z
Fresh whole blood: A feasible alternative in disasters and mass casualty incidents? a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: While balanced blood component therapy (BCT) is pivotal in trauma patient damage control resuscitation in well-resourced settings, disasters, and mass casualty incidents (MCIs) pose significant challenges, especially in securing sufficient access to blood products. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to explore the utilization of fresh whole blood (FWB) transfusion as a potential alternative to BCT, informing future research and clinical strategies.
Methods: We searched Pubmed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library and grey literature for articles identifying FWB transfusions, limited to those published in English or French. We evaluated the outcomes of post-FWB transfusion and conducted a meta-analysis comparing overall mortality in patients receiving FWB in addition to BCT during damage control resuscitation with those receiving BCT or single blood components alone.
Results: Of the 4830 studies identified, only 74 articles met all the eligibility criteria; the majority of them were conducted in military contexts. Mortality was lower among the FWB group compared to the BCT alone group, with a pooled OR of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.38-0.98) overall, and a pooled OR of 0.47 (95% CI: 0.25-0.87) among studies adjusting for confounders. FWB transfusion related complications rarely occurred.
Conclusions: While FWB shows potential as an alternative to BCT for managing severe haemorrhagic shock in disasters and MCIs, additional research is essential to validate FWB's efficacy before considering it as a standard approach in civilian scenarios. Further studies focusing on the feasibility of implementing FWB in civilian contexts are also warranted.
Keywords: Damage control resuscitation\; Disasters; Fresh whole blood; Mass casualty incidents; Walking blood banks.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declartions. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Holcomb JB, Jenkins D, Rhee P, et al. Damage control resuscitation: directly addressing the early coagulopathy of trauma. J Trauma. 2007;62(2):307–10. - PubMed
-
- Ssentongo AE, Ssentongo P, Heilbrunn E, Laufenberg Puopolo L, Chinchilli VM, Oh J, Hazelton J. Whole blood versus component therapy for haemostatic resuscitation of major bleeding: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11(10):e043967. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043967. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
