Drug susceptibility testing of Nocardia spp. using the disk diffusion method
- PMID: 39696557
- PMCID: PMC11657736
- DOI: 10.1186/s12941-024-00768-2
Drug susceptibility testing of Nocardia spp. using the disk diffusion method
Abstract
Background: Drug susceptibility testing (DST) for Nocardia spp. is essential to initiate effective antibiotic therapy. Currently, the only recommended technique is the determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) by microdilution. This method can be tedious to perform, despite the availability of ready-to-use plates. Herein, the aim was to determine the critical inhibition diameters specific to Nocardia spp.
Methods: MICs of 134 Nocardia isolates were determined by microdilution. Interpretative categories (Susceptible/Intermediate/Resistant) were determined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints. In parallel, disk diffusion DST was performed. Receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the inhibition diameter value that best discriminated between susceptible and non-susceptible strains (intermediate/resistant). The category agreement (CA), the rate of major (maj) and very major (vmj) discrepancies between microdilution and disk diffusion method was calculated.
Results: For tobramycin, the critical diameter of 19 mm (diameter ≤ 19 mm = resistant strain; diameter > 19 mm = susceptible strain) provided a CA of 98.5%, 0.0% vmj, and 2.9% maj discrepancies, reaching strictly the acceptable performance criteria defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). For amikacin, the critical diameter of 25 mm (diameter ≤ 25 mm = resistant strain; diameter > 25 mm = susceptible strain) provided a CA of 98.5%, 0.0% vmj, and 1.5% maj discrepancies. For imipenem, excluding N. farcinica and N. cyriacigeorgica, the critical diameter of 29 mm (diameter ≤ 29 mm = resistant strain; diameter > 29 mm = susceptible strain), provided a CA of 98.6%, 0.0% vmj, and 0.0% maj discrepancies. Despite an estimated vmj rate 0.0%, the 95%-confident-interval exceeded the FDA criteria due to an insufficient number of amikacin/imipenem-resistant strains. For other tested antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, ceftriaxone, cotrimoxazole, linezolid), the FDA criteria were not reached.
Conclusions: Although the FDA criteria were mostly unmet, disk diffusion DST was suitable to accurately categorize Nocardia isolates into interpretative categories for the aminoglycosides and imipenem only, excluding species N. farcinica and N. cyriacigeorgica.
Keywords: Nocardia spp.; Critical inhibition diameters; Disk diffusion; Drug susceptibility testing; Microdilution.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures












Similar articles
-
[Comparative evaluation of e-test and disk diffusion methods for susceptibility testing of Nocardia species].Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011 Apr;45(2):274-9. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2011. PMID: 21644070 Turkish.
-
[Antimicrobial susceptibilities of clinical Nocardia isolates identified by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis].Mikrobiyol Bul. 2016 Jan;50(1):11-20. doi: 10.5578/mb.10639. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2016. PMID: 27058325 Turkish.
-
Comparison of ciprofloxacin and aminoglycoside susceptibility testing for ceftriaxone non-susceptible Enterobacterales by disk diffusion and VITEK 2 vs. broth microdilution using updated Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints.BMC Microbiol. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-03923-7. BMC Microbiol. 2025. PMID: 40165044 Free PMC article.
-
Multisite reproducibility of the broth microdilution method for susceptibility testing of Nocardia species.J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Apr;50(4):1270-80. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00994-11. Epub 2012 Jan 4. J Clin Microbiol. 2012. PMID: 22219309 Free PMC article.
-
The species distribution and antimicrobial resistance profiles of Nocardia species in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Jul 10;17(7):e0011432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0011432. eCollection 2023 Jul. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023. PMID: 37428800 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Performance Comparison of Two In-House PCR Methods for Detecting Neisseria meningitidis in Asymptomatic Carriers and Antimicrobial Resistance Profiling.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 6;15(5):637. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15050637. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40075884 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Margalit I, Lebeaux D, Tishler O, Goldberg E, Bishara J, Yahav D et al. How do I manage nocardiosis? Clin Microbiol infect off publ eur soc clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021;27:550–8. - PubMed
-
- Ott SR, Meier N, Kolditz M, Bauer TT, Rohde G, Presterl E, et al. Pulmonary nocardiosis in Western Europe-Clinical evaluation of 43 patients and population-based estimates of hospitalization rates. Int J Infect Dis IJID off Publ Int Soc Infect Dis. 2019;81:140–8. - PubMed
-
- Jorgensen JH, Ferraro MJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: a review of general principles and contemporary practices. Clin Infect Dis off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2009;49:1749–55. - PubMed
-
- CASFM_2013.pdf [Internet]. [cited 2024 Jan 16]. https://www.sfm-microbiologie.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/CASFM_2013.pdf
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous