Staging lymphadenectomy should not be an antecedent to treatment in localized prostatic carcinoma
- PMID: 3969766
Staging lymphadenectomy should not be an antecedent to treatment in localized prostatic carcinoma
Abstract
The current controversy focusing on regional node evaluation in patients with prostatic carcinoma has been engendered by the enhanced biologic risk created by regional lymph node extension. The data indicate that node-positive disease is a systemic disorder and, as such, is not controlled by local treatment, such as lymphadenectomy combined with either radical removal of the primary malignancy or local radiation therapy. If lymphadenectomy is only prognostic and not therapeutic, it is reasonable to argue that any form of anatomic staging that permits the identification of nodal extension is a replacement for staging lymphadenectomy.
Similar articles
-
Lymph node assessment and lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer.J Surg Oncol. 2009 Mar 15;99(4):215-24. doi: 10.1002/jso.21225. J Surg Oncol. 2009. PMID: 19170044 Review.
-
The prognostic role of lymphadenectomy in adenocarcinoma of the prostate.Urol Clin North Am. 1980 Oct;7(3):615-22. Urol Clin North Am. 1980. PMID: 7456174
-
Pelvic lymphadenectomy as staging before definitive treatment of prostatic carcinoma.Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1988;110:155-61. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1988. PMID: 3142034
-
Incidence of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of < or =10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score of < or =6, and their influence on PSA progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy.BJU Int. 2006 Jun;97(6):1173-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06166.x. BJU Int. 2006. PMID: 16686707
-
Role of pelvic lymphadenectomy in prostate cancer management.Urology. 2007 Feb;69(2):203-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.031. Urology. 2007. PMID: 17320652 Review. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical