Root-filling materials for endodontic surgery: biological and clinical aspects
- PMID: 39698344
- PMCID: PMC11653206
- DOI: 10.2340/biid.v11.42172
Root-filling materials for endodontic surgery: biological and clinical aspects
Abstract
The placement of root filling materials aims to prevent the occurrence of post-treatment apical periodontitis following completion of endodontic treatment. Materials should possess properties that will not permit bacterial invasion and infection, namely excellent sealing ability and/or antibacterial properties. In root-end filling procedures or repair of root perforations, the root filling materials are placed in a particularly challenging clinical environment, as they interface with a relatively large area with the periradicular tissues. The biological properties of these materials are therefore of significant importance. The current review discusses the most widely used materials for endodontic surgery (i.e., root-end filling and perforation repair), with particular focus on their biological characteristics, namely antibacterial properties and interactions with host tissue cells, together with clinical studies. Properties of amalgam, glass ionomer cements (GICs), resin systems, zinc oxide eugenol-based cements and hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSCs), together with representative and well-researched commercial materials in the context of their use in endodontic surgery are presented. While the use of HCSCs seems to offer several biological advantages, together with addressing issues with the initial formulation in the most recent versions, materials with different chemical compositions, such as zinc oxide eugenol-based cements, are still in use and appear to provide similar clinical success rates to HCSCs. Thus, the significance of the currently available materials on clinical outcomes remains unclear.
Keywords: Endodontic surgery; biological properties; retrograde root filling materials.
© 2024 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.
Similar articles
-
Outcome of Endodontic Surgery: A Meta-analysis of the Literature-Part 3: Comparison of Endodontic Microsurgical Techniques with 2 Different Root-end Filling Materials.J Endod. 2018 Jun;44(6):923-931. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.021. Epub 2018 Apr 19. J Endod. 2018. PMID: 29681480 Review.
-
Calcium silicate bioactive cements: Biological perspectives and clinical applications.Dent Mater. 2015 Apr;31(4):351-70. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Feb 7. Dent Mater. 2015. PMID: 25662204 Review.
-
Radiological assessment of the effects of potential root-end filling materials on healing after endodontic surgery.Endod Dent Traumatol. 1997 Aug;13(4):176-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1997.tb00034.x. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1997. PMID: 9550043
-
Marginal adaptation of root-end filling materials: an in vitro study with teeth and replicas.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 Mar 1;10(2):75-82. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009. PMID: 19279975 Clinical Trial.
-
Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview - part II: other clinical applications and complications.Int Endod J. 2018 Mar;51(3):284-317. doi: 10.1111/iej.12843. Epub 2017 Oct 11. Int Endod J. 2018. PMID: 28846134 Review.
References
-
- Peters OA, Peters CI, Basrani B. Cleaning and shaping of the root canal system. In: Berman LH, Hargreaves KM, editors. Cohen’s pathways of the pulp. 12th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020. p. 456–536.
-
- Ørstavik D. Endodontic filling materials. Endod Top. 2014;31:53–67. 10.1111/etp.12068 - DOI
-
- Ørstavik D. Endodontic treatment of apical periodontitis. In: Ørstavik D, editor. Essential endodontology. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2019. p. 313–44.
-
- Camilleri J, Pertl C. Root-end filling and perforation repair materials and techniques. In: Camilleri J, editor. Endodontic materials in clinical practice. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2021. p. 219–61.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources