Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Oct 29:11:42172.
doi: 10.2340/biid.v11.42172. eCollection 2024.

Root-filling materials for endodontic surgery: biological and clinical aspects

Affiliations
Review

Root-filling materials for endodontic surgery: biological and clinical aspects

Andreas Koutroulis et al. Biomater Investig Dent. .

Abstract

The placement of root filling materials aims to prevent the occurrence of post-treatment apical periodontitis following completion of endodontic treatment. Materials should possess properties that will not permit bacterial invasion and infection, namely excellent sealing ability and/or antibacterial properties. In root-end filling procedures or repair of root perforations, the root filling materials are placed in a particularly challenging clinical environment, as they interface with a relatively large area with the periradicular tissues. The biological properties of these materials are therefore of significant importance. The current review discusses the most widely used materials for endodontic surgery (i.e., root-end filling and perforation repair), with particular focus on their biological characteristics, namely antibacterial properties and interactions with host tissue cells, together with clinical studies. Properties of amalgam, glass ionomer cements (GICs), resin systems, zinc oxide eugenol-based cements and hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSCs), together with representative and well-researched commercial materials in the context of their use in endodontic surgery are presented. While the use of HCSCs seems to offer several biological advantages, together with addressing issues with the initial formulation in the most recent versions, materials with different chemical compositions, such as zinc oxide eugenol-based cements, are still in use and appear to provide similar clinical success rates to HCSCs. Thus, the significance of the currently available materials on clinical outcomes remains unclear.

Keywords: Endodontic surgery; biological properties; retrograde root filling materials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

Similar articles

References

    1. Peters OA, Peters CI, Basrani B. Cleaning and shaping of the root canal system. In: Berman LH, Hargreaves KM, editors. Cohen’s pathways of the pulp. 12th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020. p. 456–536.
    1. European Society of Endodontology . Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J. 2006;39:921–30. 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ørstavik D. Endodontic filling materials. Endod Top. 2014;31:53–67. 10.1111/etp.12068 - DOI
    1. Ørstavik D. Endodontic treatment of apical periodontitis. In: Ørstavik D, editor. Essential endodontology. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell; 2019. p. 313–44.
    1. Camilleri J, Pertl C. Root-end filling and perforation repair materials and techniques. In: Camilleri J, editor. Endodontic materials in clinical practice. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2021. p. 219–61.

LinkOut - more resources