Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2024 Dec 13:33:e20241001.
doi: 10.1590/S2237-96222024v33e20241001.en.

Systematization of peer review in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Affiliations
Editorial

Systematization of peer review in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde

[Article in English, Portuguese]
Marcus Tolentino Silva et al. Epidemiol Serv Saude. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: TFG is executive editor of Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde: revista do SUS. MTS has no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Neff BD, Olden JD. Is Peer Review a Game of Chance? Bioscience. 2006;56(4):333–340.
    1. Goldberg A, Stelmakh I, Cho K, Oh A, Agarwal A, Belgrave D, et al. Peer Reviews of Peer Reviews: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Other Experiments. [2024 Nov 11];arXiv. 2024 :2311.09497. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09497 .
    1. Deretic V, Klionsky DJ. Not lowering the bar, just providing a step stool. Autophagy. 2021;17(7):1569–1570. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huisman J, Smits J. Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author’s perspective. Scientometrics. 2017;113(1):633–650. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Candal-Pedreira C, Rey-Brandariz J, Varela-Lema L, Pérez-Ríos M, Ruano-Ravina A. Challenges in peer review: how to guarantee the quality and transparency of the editorial process in scientific journals. Anales de pediatria. 2023;99(1):54–59. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources