Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Jul;57(3):701-708.
doi: 10.4143/crt.2024.1025. Epub 2024 Dec 16.

Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel/Cisplatin/5-Fluorouracil Combined with Pegteograstim for Unresectable, Locally Advanced Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: KCSG HN18-07

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Docetaxel/Cisplatin/5-Fluorouracil Combined with Pegteograstim for Unresectable, Locally Advanced Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: KCSG HN18-07

Bhumsuk Keam et al. Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Purpose: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) has not been established prospectively. We conducted a phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (TPF) in this population.

Materials and methods: Eligible patients had unresectable, locally advanced SNSCC, defined as T3/4 category or potential compromise of critical organ function on surgery. Three TPF (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, 5-fluorouracil 1,000 mg/m2 on days 1-4 every 3 weeks) cycles were administered with prophylactic pegteograstim. The primary outcome was the objective response rate (ORR); the secondary outcomes included 2-year progression-free survival (PFS), eyeball preservation rate, and safety.

Results: Among 28 patients screened, 25 were evaluable for efficacy (one screen-failure; two evaluable for safety only). The confirmed ORR was 72.0%. The definitive post-NAC treatment comprised chemoradiotherapy (n=15) and surgery (n=10). With a median follow-up of 25.5 months, median PFS was not reached and the 2-year PFS rate was 60.4%. Response to NAC was related to prolonged PFS (p=0.038). No patient underwent eyeball exenteration at the data cutoff point. Treatment-related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were neutropenia (48.1%) including febrile neutropenia (14.8%), followed by acute kidney injury (22.2%), nausea/vomiting (11.1%), anemia (7.4%), thrombocytopenia (7.4%), and enterocolitis (3.7%).

Conclusion: TPF NAC showed a promising efficacy and might help preserve critical structures in this population, which needs to be validated in a large prospective trial (KCT0003377).

Keywords: Nasal cavity; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Paranasal sinus; Prognosiss; Squamous cell carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

Pegteograstim was provided by Green Cross Cooperation (Korea).

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
CONSORT study diagram. CRT, chemoradiotherapy; NAC, neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Waterfall plot of maximum percent change in the sum of target lesions from baseline according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor ver. 1.1; each bar represents a patient. CR, complete response; CRT, chemoradiotherapy.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Kaplan-Meier curves for progression-free survival in total population (A), in evaluable population (n=25) by neoadjuvant chemotherapy response (B), and by type of definitive treatment (C). CR, complete response; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
A case of a T4b maxillary sinus cancer patients treated with docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (TPF) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT). (A) Magnetic resonance imaging at diagnosis, after completion of three cycles of NAC, and 4-year follow up after CRT. (B) Radiation field and normal tissue dose before and after NAC.

Similar articles

References

    1. Ackall FY, Issa K, Barak I, Teitelbaum J, Jang DW, Jung SH, et al. Survival outcomes in sinonasal poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2021;131:E1040–8. - PubMed
    1. Ferrari M, Taboni S, Carobbio AL, Emanuelli E, Maroldi R, Bossi P, et al. Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma, a narrative reappraisal of the current evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:2835. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jain S, Li Y, Kuan EC, Tajudeen BA, Batra PS. Prognostic factors in paranasal sinus squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma: a SEER database analysis. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2019;80:258–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dutta R, Dubal PM, Svider PF, Liu JK, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Sinonasal malignancies: a population-based analysis of site-specific incidence and survival. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:2491–7. - PubMed
    1. Lee MM, Vokes EE, Rosen A, Witt ME, Weichselbaum RR, Haraf DJ. Multimodality therapy in advanced paranasal sinus carcinoma: superior long-term results. Cancer J Sci Am. 1999;5:219–23. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources