Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 Jul;120(7):1345-1359.
doi: 10.1111/add.16730. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

Lisdexamfetamine in the treatment of methamphetamine dependence: A randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Lisdexamfetamine in the treatment of methamphetamine dependence: A randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Nadine Ezard et al. Addiction. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Aims: This study tested the efficacy and safety of a 12-week course of lisdexamfetamine in reducing methamphetamine use, an outcome which is associated with improvements in health and wellbeing, in people dependent on methamphetamine.

Design, setting and participants: This study was a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial conducted in six specialist outpatient clinics in Adelaide, Melbourne, Newcastle and Sydney, Australia (2018-2021). Participants were164 adults with methamphetamine dependence, reporting at least 14 use days out of the previous 28 days (62% male, 38% female, < 1% other; mean age 39 years).

Interventions: Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to a 15-week regimen of lisdexamfetamine (1-week induction to 250 mg, 12-week maintenance regimen, 2-week reduction; n = 80) or matched placebo (n = 84), followed-up to Week 19.

Measurements: The primary efficacy measure was past 28-day methamphetamine use at Week 13. Safety was assessed by adverse event rates. Secondary measures included methamphetamine use during the 12-week treatment period and treatment satisfaction.

Findings: Nine randomized participants did not start treatment (five were allocated to lisdexamfetamine and four allocated to placebo) and were excluded from the analyses. Fifty-seven per cent of participants were retained on study medication to primary end-point. There was only weak evidence of a lisdexamfetamine benefit at 13 weeks [adjusted difference in days of methamphetamine use = 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.5 to 5.0; P = 0.49]. However, throughout the whole 12-week treatment maintenance phase, the lisdexamfetamine group had fewer days of methamphetamine use in total (difference = 8.8, 95% CI = 2.7-15.0; P = 0.005). The lisdexamfetamine group reported greater self-reported treatment effectiveness [odds ratio (OR) = 2.89, 95% CI = 1.67-5.02; P < 0.001] and treatment satisfaction (OR = 3.80, 95% CI = 1.93-7.47; P < 0.001). Adverse events with lisdexamfetamine included nausea. Serious adverse events occurred in four (5%) of participants who received lisdexamfetamine.

Conclusions: Lisdexamfetamine appears to reduce methamphetamine use over a 12-week treatment period, although there is only weak evidence that reduced use is maintained during the last 4 weeks.

Keywords: Clinical trial; lisdexamfetamine; methamphetamine; methamphetamine dependence; methamphetamine use disorder; non‐abstinence outcomes; randomized controlled trial; stimulants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

D.L. is supported by a NHMRC Investigator Grant (1196892). M.F. has received unrestricted funding for research purposes from Indivior and Sequiiris. M.M. has been an advisory board member for AbbVie Australia and Pfizer Australia, both unrelated to this project. N.L. has received funding from NHMRC, Camurus AB and Indivior for unrelated research. R.B. was an investigator on an untied education grant from Mundipharma to conduct post‐marketing surveillance on oxycodone and an untied educational grant from Reckitt‐Benckiser to develop a scale to identify extra medical use of pharmaceutical opioids. S.A. has received speaker honoraria from Camurus, Indivior, Gilead and Janssen for work unrelated to this study. All other authors have no relevant conflicts to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) diagram trial profile.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Retention rate.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Primary outcome (days of methamphetamine use).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. United Nations Office on drugs and crime . World Drug Report 2023. Available at: https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/world-drug-report-2023..... Accessed 26 February 2024.
    1. Farrell M, Martin NK, Stockings E, Bórquez A, Cepeda JA, Degenhardt L, et al. Responding to global stimulant use: challenges and opportunities. Lancet. 2019;394:1652–1667. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Crescenzo F, Amato L. Psychosocial interventions for psychostimulant misuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;9:CD011866. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hillhouse MP, Marinelli‐Casey P, Gonzales R, Ang A, Rawson RA, Authors MTPC. Predicting in‐treatment performance and post‐treatment outcomes in methamphetamine users. Addiction. 2007;96:84–95. - PubMed
    1. Siefried KJ, Acheson LS, Lintzeris N, Ezard N. Pharmacological treatment of methamphetamine/amphetamine dependence: a systematic review. CNS Drugs. 2020;34:337–365. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances