Self-reported Hearing Quality of Life for Adolescent Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Longitudinal Study
- PMID: 39701147
- PMCID: PMC12126847
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1791212
Self-reported Hearing Quality of Life for Adolescent Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Longitudinal Study
Abstract
Background: Clinicians are increasingly interested in self-reported hearing-specific quality of life (HQoL) for cochlear implant (CI) recipients, including pediatric CI recipients.
Purpose: (1) To compare HQoL of adolescent CI recipients to those of peers with typical hearing (TH); (2) to examine, longitudinally, HQoL for a set of CI recipients; and (3) to determine the effects of child, demographic, audiological, speech perception, and language variables on adolescent HQoL.
Research design: Hearing Environments and Reflections on Quality of Life (HEARQL) questionnaires were completed by children with CIs at elementary (HEARQL-26) and adolescent (HEARQL-28) ages.
Study sample: Eighty CI recipients and 21 children with TH.
Data collection and analysis: HEARQL-28 scores for the CI and TH groups were compared using nonparametric tests. Regression models were used to examine longitudinal results and to explore predictor variables for adolescent CI participants' HEARQL-28 scores.
Results: HEARQL-28 scores for CI participants were lower than those of peers with TH. For both CI and TH adolescents, the HEARQL subscale with the lowest score is "Hearing Situations." CI participants' HEARQL scores at elementary age were not significantly correlated with scores at adolescence. Over 70% of unexplained variance remains even after inclusion of variables with established contributions to traditional CI benefit.
Conclusions: Self-reported HEARQL scores are largely unexplained for pediatric CI recipients; multidisciplinary explorations of other sources of variance, such as social, emotional, and psychosocial factors, should be pursued.
American Academy of Audiology. This article is published by Thieme.
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Similar articles
-
Self-reported hearing quality of life measures in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with bilateral input.Cochlear Implants Int. 2020 Mar;21(2):83-91. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2019.1670486. Epub 2019 Oct 7. Cochlear Implants Int. 2020. PMID: 31590628 Free PMC article.
-
Spectral Modulation Detection Performance and Speech Perception in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.Am J Audiol. 2021 Dec 9;30(4):1076-1087. doi: 10.1044/2021_AJA-21-00076. Epub 2021 Oct 20. Am J Audiol. 2021. PMID: 34670098 Free PMC article.
-
American parent perspectives on quality of life in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.Ear Hear. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):269-78. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000108. Ear Hear. 2015. PMID: 25377531
-
[Cochlear implant in children: rational, indications and cost/efficacy].Minerva Pediatr. 2013 Jun;65(3):325-39. Minerva Pediatr. 2013. PMID: 23685383 Review. Italian.
-
Implantable Devices for Single-Sided Deafness and Conductive or Mixed Hearing Loss: A Health Technology Assessment.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):1-165. eCollection 2020. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2020. PMID: 32194878 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical