Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jul;35(7-08):178-184.
doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1791212. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

Self-reported Hearing Quality of Life for Adolescent Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Longitudinal Study

Affiliations

Self-reported Hearing Quality of Life for Adolescent Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Longitudinal Study

Lisa S Davidson et al. J Am Acad Audiol. 2024 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Clinicians are increasingly interested in self-reported hearing-specific quality of life (HQoL) for cochlear implant (CI) recipients, including pediatric CI recipients.

Purpose: (1) To compare HQoL of adolescent CI recipients to those of peers with typical hearing (TH); (2) to examine, longitudinally, HQoL for a set of CI recipients; and (3) to determine the effects of child, demographic, audiological, speech perception, and language variables on adolescent HQoL.

Research design: Hearing Environments and Reflections on Quality of Life (HEARQL) questionnaires were completed by children with CIs at elementary (HEARQL-26) and adolescent (HEARQL-28) ages.

Study sample: Eighty CI recipients and 21 children with TH.

Data collection and analysis: HEARQL-28 scores for the CI and TH groups were compared using nonparametric tests. Regression models were used to examine longitudinal results and to explore predictor variables for adolescent CI participants' HEARQL-28 scores.

Results: HEARQL-28 scores for CI participants were lower than those of peers with TH. For both CI and TH adolescents, the HEARQL subscale with the lowest score is "Hearing Situations." CI participants' HEARQL scores at elementary age were not significantly correlated with scores at adolescence. Over 70% of unexplained variance remains even after inclusion of variables with established contributions to traditional CI benefit.

Conclusions: Self-reported HEARQL scores are largely unexplained for pediatric CI recipients; multidisciplinary explorations of other sources of variance, such as social, emotional, and psychosocial factors, should be pursued.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Similar articles

References

    1. Lin FR, Niparko JK. Measuring health-related quality of life after pediatric cochlear implantation: a systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. Oct 2006;70(10):1695–706. doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.05.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roland L, Fischer C, Tran K, Rachakonda T, Kallogjeri D, Lieu JE. Quality of Life in Children with Hearing Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Aug 2016;155(2):208–19. doi:10.1177/0194599816640485 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Suneel D, Davidson LS, Lieu J. Self-reported hearing quality of life measures in pediatric cochlear implant recipients with bilateral input. Cochlear Implants Int. Mar 2020;21(2):83–91. doi:10.1080/14670100.2019.1670486 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Umansky AM, Jeffe DB, Lieu JEC. The HEAR-QL: Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children with Hearing Loss. J Am Acad Audiol. // 2011;22(10):644–653. doi:10.3766/jaaa.22.10.3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moberly AC, Harris MS, Boyce L, et al. Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things? Laryngoscope. Apr 2018;128(4):959–966. doi:10.1002/lary.26791 - DOI - PMC - PubMed