Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jan 7;101(1):fiae166.
doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiae166.

An interdisciplinary perspective of the built-environment microbiome

Affiliations
Review

An interdisciplinary perspective of the built-environment microbiome

John S McAlister et al. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. .

Abstract

The built environment provides an excellent setting for interdisciplinary research on the dynamics of microbial communities. The system is simplified compared to many natural settings, and to some extent the entire environment can be manipulated, from architectural design to materials use, air flow, human traffic, and capacity to disrupt microbial communities through cleaning. Here, we provide an overview of the ecology of the microbiome in the built environment. We address niche space and refugia, population, and community (metagenomic) dynamics, spatial ecology within a building, including the major microbial transmission mechanisms, as well as evolution. We also address landscape ecology, connecting microbiomes between physically separated buildings. At each stage, we pay particular attention to the actual and potential interface between disciplines, such as ecology, epidemiology, materials science, and human social behavior. We end by identifying some opportunities for future interdisciplinary research on the microbiome of the built environment.

Keywords: environmental ecology; microbial anthropocene; multidisciplinary microbial ecology; one health; urban metagenome; urban microbiome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JSM, MJB, YB, NHF, QH, DLM, CS, KSC, HSR, and JMR declare no conflict of interest. ETL has done consulting work within the past 3 years for View Inc.; View Inc. did not support this work in any way, nor have any influence over any aspect or component of the manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A heuristic view of the built microbiome. The inset is the bacterium Klebsiella, shown at 5000× magnification.

References

    1. Adams RI, Bateman AC, Bik HM et al. Microbiota of the indoor environment: a meta-analysis. Microbiome. 2015;3:1–18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson DJ, Moehring RW, Weber DJ et al. Effectiveness of targeted enhanced terminal room disinfection on hospital-wide acquisition and infection with multidrug-resistant organisms and Clostridium difficile: a secondary analysis of a multicentre cluster randomised controlled trial with crossover design (BETR Disinfection). Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18:845–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arjmandi H, Amini R, Fallahpour M. Minimizing the respiratory pathogen transmission: numerical study and multi-objective optimization of ventilation systems in a classroom. Therm Sci Eng Prog. 2022;28:101052.
    1. Artasensi A, Mazzotta S, Fumagalli L. Back to basics: choosing the appropriate surface disinfectant. Antibiotics. 2021;10:613. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assadian O, Harbarth S, Vos M et al. Practical recommendations for routine cleaning and disinfection procedures in healthcare institutions: a narrative review. J Hosp Infect. 2021;113:104–14. - PubMed