Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):822.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07024-7.

Does caesarean section have an impact on exclusive breastfeeding? Evidence from four Southeast Asian countries

Kyaw Lwin Show  1 , Nampet Jampathong  2 , Pyae Linn Aung  3 , Kyawt Mon Win  4 , Chetta Ngamjarus  5 , Porjai Pattanittum  5 , Thae Maung Maung  6 , Khaing Nwe Tin  4 , Su Mon Myat  4 , Meghan A Bohren  7 , Nogati Chairunnisa  8 , Pisake Lumbiganon  9
Affiliations

Does caesarean section have an impact on exclusive breastfeeding? Evidence from four Southeast Asian countries

Kyaw Lwin Show et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: The effect of caesarean section (CS) on breastfeeding initiation has been extensively studied, but its influence on exclusive breastfeeding practices remains inconclusive. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the impact of CS on exclusive breastfeeding using evidence from four countries in the Southeast Asian region.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used secondary data obtained from the Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) conducted between 2016 and 2022 in four countries within the Southeast Asian Region. We included information on the youngest children aged 0-5 months living with their mothers within the DHS datasets. The association between CS and exclusive breastfeeding was determined using a simple and multiple logistic regression models. Weight factors were taken into account in all analyses for the two-stage stratified cluster sampling design.

Results: Among 3420 children, nearly half (49.1%, 95%CI: 47.0, 51.2) were exclusively breastfed. Children born by CS had lower odds of being exclusively breastfed, compared to children born vaginally (aOR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.53, 0.88). Women who were married or living with a partner (aOR = 2.19, 95%CI: 1.33, 3.60), children born at a health facility (aOR = 1.31, 95%CI: 1.00, 1.71), and girl babies (aOR = 1.24, 95%CI: 1.05, 1.48) had higher odds of exclusive breastfeeding. Furthermore, residing in rural areas was associated with an increased likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding (aOR = 1.47, 95%CI: 1.20, 1.80). Maternal age, mother's education, parity, antenatal and postnatal care taken, and mass media exposure were not associated with exclusive breastfeeding.

Conclusion: This study highlights a significant association between CS and reduced exclusive breastfeeding practices. The findings underscore the importance of providing adequate support and interventions to mothers who deliver by CS and their family members to ensure they can successfully achieve exclusive breastfeeding, particularly in a global context where CS rates are rising.

Keywords: Caesarean section; Demographic and Health Survey; Exclusive breastfeeding; Maternal health; Newborn health; Southeast Asia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The DHS studies were conducted in compliance with ethical standards and obtained ethics approval from the local ethics committees. Respondents’ identities were kept confidential, and the dataset provided was already de-identified and fully anonymized. The study title was also registered at the DHS program website. The authorization letter to use the survey datasets has been granted by the DHS program officials. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Caesarean section rates and exclusive breastfeeding rates (accounted for the survey design characteristics) by country
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0148343. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Souza JP, Zhang J. Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6:e005671. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, et al. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet. 2018;392:1341–8. - PubMed
    1. Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, Ye J, Mikolajczyk R, Deneux-Tharaux C, et al. What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies. Reprod Health. 2015;12:57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Betran AP, Torloni MR, Zhang JJ, Gülmezoglu AM. WHO statement on caesarean section rates. BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;123:667–70. - PMC - PubMed