Efficacy of CTLA-4 checkpoint therapy is dependent on IL-21 signaling to mediate cytotoxic reprogramming of PD-1+CD8+ T cells
- PMID: 39702858
- DOI: 10.1038/s41590-024-02027-0
Efficacy of CTLA-4 checkpoint therapy is dependent on IL-21 signaling to mediate cytotoxic reprogramming of PD-1+CD8+ T cells
Abstract
The mechanisms underlying the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) therapy are incompletely understood. Here, by immune profiling responding PD-1+CD8+ T (TResp) cell populations from patients with advanced melanoma, we identified differential programming of TResp cells in response to combination therapy, from an exhausted toward a more cytotoxic effector program. This effect does not occur with anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Single-cell transcriptome and T cell receptor repertoire analysis was used to identify altered effector programming of expanding PD-1+CD8+ T cell clones with distinct regulon usage, STAT1 and STAT3 utilization and antitumor specificity connected to interleukin (IL)-21 signaling in combination and anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy. Therapeutic efficacy of CTLA-4 blockade was lost in B16F10 melanoma models with either Il21r- deficiency or anti-IL-21 receptor blockade. Together, these results show how IL-21 signaling to TResp is critical for anti-CTLA-4-based checkpoint therapies and highlight major signaling differences to anti-PD-1 monotherapy.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: F.M. served as consultant and/or has received honoraria or travel support from Novartis, Roche, BMS, MSD, Pierre Fabre and Sunpharma. D.R.S. served as consultant and/or has received honoraria from Roche and BMS and travel support from Sunpharma and Sanofi. R.Z. has received honoraria from Novartis, INcyte, MNK and Sanofi. R.V. has received honoraria or travel support from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Galapagos, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche, and research grant support from Novartis and Pfizer. J.W. consulted for and received <US$10,000 per annum from Merck, Genentech, AstraZeneca, GSK, Novartis, Nektar, Celldex, Incyte, Biond, Moderna, ImCheck, Sellas, Evaxion, Pfizer, Regeneron and EMD Serono and received US$10,000–25,000 from BMS for membership on advisory boards. J.W. also held equity in Biond, Evaxion, OncoC4 and Instil Bio, was on the scientific advisory boards for CytomX, Incyte, ImCheck, Biond, Sellas, Instil Bio, OncoC4 and NexImmune, and was remunerated with between US$10,000 and US$50,000. In addition, J.W. is named on a patent filed by Moffitt Cancer Center on an ipilimumab biomarker and on tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte preparation, and on a PD-1 patent filed by Biodesix. J.W. received <US$6,000 in royalties. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
- 520992132/Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
- 390939984/Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
- 272983813/Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
- 505372148/Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
- 256073931/Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
Miscellaneous