Effect of IV Thrombolysis With Alteplase in Patients With Vessel Occlusion in the WAKE-UP Trial
- PMID: 39705631
- PMCID: PMC11666272
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209871
Effect of IV Thrombolysis With Alteplase in Patients With Vessel Occlusion in the WAKE-UP Trial
Abstract
Background and objectives: Data from randomized trials on the treatment effect of pure thrombolysis in patients with vessel occlusion are lacking. We examined data from a corresponding subsample of patients from the multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled WAKE-UP trial to determine whether MRI-guided IV thrombolysis with alteplase in unknown-onset ischemic stroke benefits patients presenting with vessel occlusion.
Methods: Patients with an acute ischemic lesion visible on MRI diffusion-weighted imaging but no marked parenchymal hyperintensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images were randomized to treatment with IV alteplase or placebo. The primary end point was a favorable outcome defined by a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1 at 90 days after stroke. We investigated the interaction between vessel status and treatment effect using an unconditional logistic regression model. Treatment effects (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]) and their 95% CI were compared in patients with and without any vessel occlusion (AVO) and large vessel occlusion (LVO).
Results: 185 patients (mean age 64.5 years, 46% female, median NIH Stroke Scale score 9, median time between last seen well and MRI 10.26 hours) received treatment and presented with an occlusion. 98 (20%) had LVO (defined as occlusion of the internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery trunk, or combination). A favorable outcome was observed in 30 of 94 patients with AVO (31.9%) in the alteplase group and in 18 of 91 (19.8%) in the placebo group (aOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.00-4.18). In the subgroup of patients with LVO, a favorable outcome was observed in 16 of 53 (30.2%) in the alteplase group and in 7 of 44 (15.9%) in the placebo group (aOR 2.08, 95% CI 0.71-6.10). Treatment with alteplase was associated with higher odds of favorable outcomes with no heterogeneity of treatment effect between patients with AVO and patent vessel (p = 0.56), or between patients with and without LVO (p = 0.69).
Discussion: Although the WAKE-UP study was not powered to demonstrate treatment efficacy in patient subpopulations, this subgroup analysis points to a benefit of MRI-guided thrombolysis in patients with unknown-onset ischemic stroke, independent of vessel occlusion.
Clinical trial registration: Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with unique identifier NCT01525290 (clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01525290). The study was first posted on February 2, 2012; the first patient was enrolled on September 24, 2012.
Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with unknown-onset ischemic stroke with AVO, MRI-guided treatment with IV tissue plasminogen activator improves outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
I. Galinovic and J.B. Fiebach report grants from European Union 7th Framework Program during the conduct of the study. F. Boutitie reports grants from University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf during the conduct of the study. B. Cheng reports grants from European Union 7th Framework Program during the conduct of the study. T.-H. Cho reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. M. Ebinger reports grants from European Union 7th Framework Program during the conduct of the study. M. Endres, C. Enzinger, J. Fiehler, I. Ford, J. Gregori, M. Günther, and R. Lemmens report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. K.W. Muir reports grants from European Union 7th Framework Program during the conduct of the study. N. Nighoghossian, P. Roy, and C.Z. Simonsen report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. V. Thijs reports grants from European Union 7th Framework Program during the conduct of the study. A. Wouters reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. C. Gerloff, G. Thomalla, and S. Pedraza report grants from European Union 7th Framework Program during the conduct of the study. Go to
Figures


References
-
- Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, et al. . Guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: 2019 update to the 2018 guidelines for the early management of acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Sssociation. Stroke. 2019;50(12):e344-e418. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000211 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Saqqur M, Uchino K, Demchuk AM, et al. ; CLOTBUST Investigators. Site of arterial occlusion identified by transcranial Doppler predicts the response to intravenous thrombolysis for stroke. Stroke. 2007;38(3):948-954. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000257304.21967.ba - DOI - PubMed
-
- Majoie CB, Cavalcante F, Gralla J, et al. ; IRIS collaborators. Value of intravenous thrombolysis in endovascular treatment for large-vessel anterior circulation stroke: individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials. Lancet. 2023;402(10406):965-974. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01142-X - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials