Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May;21(5):702-709.
doi: 10.1200/OP-24-00489. Epub 2024 Dec 20.

Real-World Safety and Health Care Resource Utilization of Teclistamab Under an Outpatient Model for Step-Up Dosing Administration

Affiliations

Real-World Safety and Health Care Resource Utilization of Teclistamab Under an Outpatient Model for Step-Up Dosing Administration

Tyler B Sandahl et al. JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Teclistamab is initiated with a step-up dosing (SUD) schedule to mitigate the risk of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Early teclistamab users commonly received SUD in a hospital setting. This study aimed to evaluate safety and health care resource utilization (HRU) in real-world patients with multiple myeloma who initiated teclistamab SUD in an outpatient setting.

Methods: This was a retrospective study using Mayo Clinic's electronic medical records from October 26, 2022, to October 31, 2023. Patient characteristics were summarized for all patients treated with teclistamab and separately for patients who started SUD outpatient. SUD pattern, safety, HRU, and post-SUD dosing schedule were described in patients with complete SUD.

Results: At data cutoff, 65 patients received ≥1 teclistamab dose, including 58 patients who initiated SUD outpatient (median age, 69.2 years; male, 63.8%; White, 89.7%). Among 57 patients who completed SUD in an outpatient setting, all received premedications on the days of teclistamab administrations per label recommendation; 18 (31.6%) developed CRS (13 grade 1, four grade 2, and one grade 4) and two developed ICANS (one each with grade 2 and 4). All CRS and ICANS resolved with supportive care and all patients continued treatment. Eighteen patients were admitted to the hospital for CRS treatment, with a median CRS-related hospital stay of 2 days per admission. Most (60%) doses during SUD required <1 hour clinic time between administration and checkout. Post-SUD, clinic time for treatment doses decreased to <30 minutes for most doses (82%).

Conclusion: Outcomes of this study support outpatient administration as a safe and feasible option for teclistamab SUD to potentially reduce HRU and improve patient experiences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or ascopubs.org/op/authors/author-center.

Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (Open Payments).

Shaji Kumar

Consulting or Advisory Role: Takeda (Inst), Janssen Oncology (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene (Inst), Pfizer (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), K36 (Inst)

Research Funding: Takeda (Inst), AbbVie (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Sanofi (Inst), Janssen Oncology (Inst), MedImmune (Inst), Roche/Genentech (Inst), CARsgen Therapeutics (Inst), Allogene Therapeutics (Inst), GlaxoSmithKline (Inst), Regeneron (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene (Inst)

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: AbbVie, Pfizer

No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Patient attrition. BCMA, B-cell maturation antigen; SUD, step-up dosing. aBaseline demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated for all patients (N = 65) and the patients who initiated teclistamab in an outpatient setting (N = 58), respectively (Table 1). bSUD patterns and safety outcomes in subgroups with versus without BCMA exposure were analyzed for all patients who completed SUD regardless of the administration site (N = 59, including two patients who completed SUD in an inpatient setting). cSafety and health care resource utilization outcomes were analyzed for patients who completed SUD with ≥1 SUD dose in an outpatient setting (N = 57).
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Time between teclistamab administration and patient checkout during SUD and for subsequent treatment doses. Number of teclistamab doses during the SUD = 161. Number of teclistamab treatment doses = 412. SUD, step-up dosing.

References

    1. Moreau P, Garfall AL, van de Donk N, et al. : Teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 387:495-505, 2022 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Munshi NC, Anderson LD Jr, Shah N, et al. : Idecabtagene vicleucel in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 384:705-716, 2021 - PubMed
    1. Berdeja JG, Madduri D, Usmani SZ, et al. : Ciltacabtagene autoleucel, a B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CARTITUDE-1): A phase 1b/2 open-label study. Lancet 398:314-324, 2021 - PubMed
    1. Janssen : TECVAYLI [Prescribing Information]. 2024
    1. Asoori S, Popat R, Martínez-Lopez J, et al. : Real-world evaluation of teclistamab for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Blood 142:3347, 2023 - PMC - PubMed