Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1985 Feb;201(2):204-9.
doi: 10.1097/00000658-198502000-00012.

Major hepatic resection for metachronous metastases from colon cancer

Major hepatic resection for metachronous metastases from colon cancer

B Cady et al. Ann Surg. 1985 Feb.

Abstract

Hepatic resection of metastatic colorectal cancer is being performed with increasing frequency. Reports describe wide variations in survival after resection of solitary of multiple metastases. In 23 consecutive patients having major hepatic resection for metachronous metastases from colorectal cancers, 18 patients had one, two, or three metastases and five had four or more individual metastases; the cure rate of one, two, or three metachronous metastases was comparable to reports of resected solitary simultaneous metastases. The median maximum diameter of metastases in patients both surviving and dead was 7 cm. Features separating surviving from dead patients were resection margins of at least 1 cm and fewer than four metastatic nodules. All patients with four or more hepatic metastases died of disease, 80% with further liver metastases. Only three of 18 (17%) patients with one, two, or three metastases developed further hepatic lesions. This study suggests that the biology of the hepatic metastatic disease is paramount; timing of the hepatic resection is of little importance. Delayed resection of suitable biologic situations does not impair survival opportunities, and early resection of inappropriate biologic situations with more than three hepatic metastases does not improve survival. Therefore, programs of early detection with the use of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) screening or "second look" operations will not increase cure rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1962 Apr;114:438-42 - PubMed
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1982 Nov-Dec;25(8):749-54 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1984 Jun;119(6):647-51 - PubMed
    1. Am J Surg. 1978 Mar;135(3):389-94 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 1978 Sep;188(3):363-71 - PubMed