Prognostic Biomarkers in Evolving Melanoma Immunotherapy
- PMID: 39707058
- PMCID: PMC11850490
- DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00910-y
Prognostic Biomarkers in Evolving Melanoma Immunotherapy
Abstract
Melanoma, a highly aggressive form of skin cancer, has seen significant advancements in treatment through the introduction of immunotherapy. However, the variability in patient responses underscores the need for reliable biomarkers to guide treatment decisions. This article reviews key biomarkers in melanoma immunotherapy, such as PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and gene expression profiles (GEPs). It also explores emerging biomarkers, including LAG-3 expression, immune cell phenotyping in tissue and blood, gut microbiota, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Notably, ctDNA may offer valuable insights into the efficacy of T cell-engaging bispecific molecules, such as tebentafusp. The review provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving landscape of melanoma biomarkers, their role in personalizing treatment, and future research directions, including neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Funding: Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEA. R.R. reports a grant from German Cancer Aid (Max–Eder Nachwuchsgruppe, Deutsche Krebshilfe, ref. 70115384). R.R. is also funded by the Clinician Scientist Programm of Heidelberg University, Faculty of Medicine and is part of the Cancer Core Europe (CCE) Training program of Young leaders in TRAnslational Cancer research (TRYTRAC). Conflicts of Interest: Outside of this study, the authors have received the following support: R.R. has received travel expenses from Sunpharma. J.C.H. has received honoraria from Amgen, BMS, Delcath, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche, Sanofi, and Sunpharma; has served as a consultant or advisor for GSK, MSD, Pierre Fabre, Sunpharma, Immunocore, Nektar, Novartis, Philogen, Sanofi, BMS, Sunpharma, and Sanofi; and has received research funding or support for clinical studies from BMS, Sunpharma, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, BioNTech, BMS, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Idera, Immunocore, IOBiotech, Iovance, Nektar, Novartis, Philogen, Pierre Fabre, Regeneron, Replimune, Sanofi, and Seagen. A.E.H. received honoraria by Janssen-Cilag, Biotest, MSD, and Galderma and is president of the European Dermatology Forum (EDF). Ethics Approval: N/A. Consent to Participate: N/A. Consent for Publication: N/A. Availability of Data and Material: N/A. Code Availability: N/A. Authors’ Contributions: R.R. carried out study conceptualization and wrote the original draft; R.R., J.C.H., and A.E.H. revised the manuscript; J.C.H. carried out study supervision.
Figures
References
-
- Boussios S, Rassy E, Samartzis E, Moschetta M, Sheriff M, Pérez-Fidalgo JA, et al. Melanoma of unknown primary: new perspectives for an old story. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;158: 103208. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103208. - PubMed
-
- Persa O-D, Hassel JC, Steeb T, Erdmann M, Karimi B, Stege H, et al. Brief communication: treatment outcomes for advanced melanoma of unknown primary compared with melanoma with known primary. J Immunother. 2024;47:384–7. 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000537. - PubMed
-
- Wolchok JD, Chiarion-Sileni V, Rutkowski P, Cowey CL, Schadendorf D, Wagstaff J, et al. Final 10-year outcomes with nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. New Engl J Med. 2024. 10.1056/NEJMoa2407417. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
