Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Dec 20;28(1):427.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05211-8.

Intracranial multimodal monitoring in neurocritical care (Neurocore-iMMM): an open, decentralized consensus

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

Intracranial multimodal monitoring in neurocritical care (Neurocore-iMMM): an open, decentralized consensus

Sami Barrit et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Background: Intracranial multimodal monitoring (iMMM) is increasingly used in neurocritical care, but a lack of standardization hinders its evidence-based development. Here, we devised core outcome sets (COS) and reporting guidelines to harmonize iMMM practices and research.

Methods: An open, decentralized, three-round Delphi consensus study involved experts between December 2023 and June 2024. Items-spanning three domains: (i) patient characteristics, (ii) practices, and (iii) outcomes-with ≥ 75% agreement were classified as strong agreement, while those with 50-75% were reconsidered in subsequent rounds, requiring ≥ 66% for moderate agreement.

Results: An international, multidisciplinary panel comprised 58 neurocritical physicians and researchers with low attrition (12%). They were predominantly from Western regions (96%), actively involved in iMMM (82%), at least weekly (72.4%), with more than 10 years of specific experience (57%). Of the 127 items assessed for inclusion in COS and reporting guidelines, 45 (35.4%) reached strong and 8 (6.3%) moderate agreement. Main strong agreement items were: (i) demographics: age (98%) and sex/gender (90%); comorbidities: coagulation/platelet disorders (95%); initial scoring: Glasgow Coma Scale (97%) and pathology-specific scores (90%); active treatments: antithrombotics (95%) (ii) clinical practice: iMMM implantation indications (98%) and iMMM-guided interventions (91%); surgical practice: targeting strategies (97%) and concomitant external ventricular drainage (97%); technical details: recording modalities (98%); (iii) monitoring parameters: duration (97%) and triggered interventions (95%); standardized outcome reporting (93%); surgical complications (e.g., postoperative intracranial hemorrhages, CNS infections, and probe misplacement, all > 90%) and adverse events (accidental dislodgement, probe breakage, and technical malfunctions, all > 90%).

Conclusion: This consensus establishes foundational COS and reporting guidelines for iMMM in neurocritical care. These harmonization tools can enhance research quality, comparability, and reproducibility, facilitating evidence-based practices for this emerging technology. However, challenges remain in developing purpose-specific guidelines and adapting them to diverse clinical and research settings.

Keywords: Brain tissue oxygenation; ICP; Intracranial multimodal monitoring; Intracranial pressure; MNM; Microdialysis; Multimodal neuromonitoring; Neurocritical care; Pbto2; iMMM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: EA has received grants from the NIH, American Heart Association, Zoll Foundation, US Department of Defense, and Cures Within Reach. BA has received grants from NIH and the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Foundation (payment to the institution) and speaking honoraria from Natus and ASET. BB received speaking honoraria from Natus on multimodal neuro monitoring. SB disclosed being the founder of an organization for open and decentralized research, Sciense.org. MAB is a member of the Sciense initiative. FB reported lecture honoraria from Integra Life Science, participation in Elastic Trail DSMB, and receiving equipment from Massimo through a grant to build a data lake. RC received personal fees for expert testimony from Sophysa and is a member of the executive committee of the Neurocritical Care and Neuro Anesthesiology French Speaking Society (ANARLF). BF disclosed grants from the Department of Defense, consulting fees from UCB Pharma and Ceribell, lecture honoraria from UCB Pharma, Natus Medical Inc., Marinus Pharmaceuticals, and Ceribell, participation on advisory boards for Sage Therapeutics and Marinus Pharmaceuticals, and unpaid leadership roles in the Curing Coma Campaign and the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society. EG received NIH funding for the ELECTRO-BOOST trial (R01-NS117904-01) while serving on the NORSE Medical & Scientific Board. RH has consulting fees from Integra and received payments for lectures from Integra, Zoll, and BD. CL received grants from the Department of Defense for the study on the Prediction and Prevention of Intracranial Hypertension and Tissue Hypoxia in severe TBI (GRANT13518109). JL disclosed royalties from Elsevier and UpToDate and has received payments for expert testimony from Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC and Younker Hyde Macfarlane PLLC. FAM is supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG). SP serves as an Associate Editor for Neurocritical Care and a Board Trustee for the Neurocritical Care Foundation. LS holds the position of Secretary for the Neurocritical Care Society. FST received advisor fees from NEUROPTICS and NIHON KHODEN. TVE disclosed grants from the EANS Clinical Research Fund, Hersenstichting (Dutch Brain Foundation) for CIAO-TBI, and Dalhousie University Operational Grant. AW is a stockholder in iCE Neurosystems, and AY received honoraria from Raumedic AG for lectures.

References

    1. Barrit S, El Hadwe S, Al Barajraji M, Torcida N, Bogossian EG, André J, et al. Complications of intracranial multimodal monitoring for neurocritical care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2024;40(3):1182–92. - PubMed
    1. Tas J, Czosnyka M, van der Horst ICC, Park S, van Heugten C, Sekhon M, et al. Cerebral multimodality monitoring in adult neurocritical care patients with acute brain injury: a narrative review. Front Physiol. 2022. 10.3389/fphys.2022.1071161. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foreman B, Kapinos G, Wainwright MS, Ngwenya LB, O’Phelan KH, LaRovere KL, et al. Practice standards for the use of multimodality neuromonitoring: a Delphi consensus process. Crit Care Med. 2023;51(12):1740–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Webbe J, Sinha I, Gale C. Core Outcome Sets. Arch Dis Child Educ Pract. 2018;103(3):163–6. - PubMed
    1. Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, Hoey J, Schulz KF, Altman DG. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med. 2010;8:1–6. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources