Re-rupture rate and complications after percutaneous Tenolig® repair in acute midsubstance rupture of Achilles tendon
- PMID: 39708104
- DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04115-1
Re-rupture rate and complications after percutaneous Tenolig® repair in acute midsubstance rupture of Achilles tendon
Abstract
Purpose: Acute midsubstance Achilles tendon ruptures are the most common tendon injuries in adults and the choice of surgical technique is still debated. The objective of this study is to evaluate the rate of iterative ruptures and postoperative complications at a minimum follow-up of one year of percutaneous sutures of the Achilles tendon, as well as to investigate the risk factors for rupture.
Methods: In this single-center retrospective study, 142 patients (119 men and 23 women, mean age of 46 years) were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 24 (12-38) months. Percutaneous sutures with the Tenolig® device was performed by several senior surgeons. We studied the rate of re-ruptures, scar-related complications, sural nerve damage, and thromboembolic complications. The mechanism leading to the rupture was also identified, as were the risk factors.
Results: 3 patients (2.11%) presented a re-rupture. No damage of the sural nerve was found. Three superficial skin ulcerations were identified, and three patients presented superficial venous thrombosis of the lower limb. Football was the highest risk activity (34.51%). The risk factors for a first episode of rupture were smoking and a BMI over than 25 kg/m2. Nevertheless, no statistically significant risk factors could be identified for re-ruptures.
Conclusion: Percutaneous sutures of the Achilles tendon using Tenolig® provides a low risk of re-rupture, a low complication rate, particularly scar-related complications, and a respect for tendon vascularization.
Level of clinical evidence: 3.
Keywords: Achilles tendon rupture; Percutaneous repair; Re-rupture; Tenolig®.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: Didier MAINARD has received speaker and consultant honoraria from FH ORTHO. All other authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Ethical approval: The Research Ethics Committee of our institution has confirmed that ethical approval is not required, Study number: 2022PI072.
Similar articles
-
Lower re-rupture rates but higher complication rates following surgical versus conservative treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Aug;31(8):3528-3540. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07411-1. Epub 2023 Apr 28. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023. PMID: 37115231
-
Postoperative Complications After Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture Repair: A Survival Analysis of Minimally Invasive vs Open Techniques.Foot Ankle Int. 2025 Jul;46(7):707-714. doi: 10.1177/10711007251333777. Epub 2025 Apr 28. Foot Ankle Int. 2025. PMID: 40289647 Free PMC article.
-
Incidence of complications after Achillon® mini-open suture system for repair of acute midsubstance achilles tendon ruptures: a systematic review.J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;53(6):744-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Sep 8. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014. PMID: 25201234
-
Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Am J Sports Med. 2012 Sep;40(9):2154-60. doi: 10.1177/0363546512453293. Epub 2012 Jul 16. Am J Sports Med. 2012. PMID: 22802271
-
Open surgical repair as gold standard for acute Achilles tendon ruptures: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jul;33(7):2664-2683. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12686. Epub 2025 May 19. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025. PMID: 40387102
References
-
- Lemme NJ, Li NY, DeFroda SF, Kleiner J, Owens BD (2018) Epidemiology of Achilles tendon ruptures in the united states: athletic and nonathletic injuries from 2012 to 2016. Orthop J Sports Med 6:2325967118808238. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118808238 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Svedman S, Marcano A, Ackermann PW, Felländer-Tsai L, Berg HE (2024) Acute Achilles tendon ruptures between 2002–2021: sustained increased incidence, surgical decline and prolonged delay to surgery-a nationwide study of 53 688 ruptures in Sweden. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 10:e001960. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-001960 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Reda Y, Farouk A, Abdelmonem I, El Shazly OA (2020) Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for acute Achilles’ tendon rupture. A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis. Foot Ankle Surg 26:280–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2019.03.010 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Holm C, Kjaer M, Eliasson P (2015) Achilles tendon rupture - treatment and complications: a systematic review: treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25:e1–e10. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12209 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Costa ML, Achten J, Marian IR, Dutton SJ, Lamb SE, Ollivere B et al (2020) Plaster cast versus functional brace for non-surgical treatment of Achilles tendon rupture (UKSTAR): a multicentre randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation. Lancet 395:441–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32942-3 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials