Using clinical data to reclassify ESUS patients to large artery atherosclerotic or cardioembolic stroke mechanisms
- PMID: 39708145
- DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12848-6
Using clinical data to reclassify ESUS patients to large artery atherosclerotic or cardioembolic stroke mechanisms
Abstract
Purpose: Embolic stroke of unidentified source (ESUS) represents 10-25% of all ischemic strokes. Our goal was to determine whether ESUS could be reclassified to cardioembolic (CE) or large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) with machine learning (ML) using conventional clinical data.
Methods: We retrospectively collected conventional clinical features, including patient, imaging (MRI, CT/CTA), cardiac, and serum data from established cases of CE and LAA stroke, and factors with p < 0.2 in univariable analysis were used for creating a ML predictive tool. We then applied this tool to ESUS cases, with ≥ 75% likelihood serving as the threshold for reclassification to CE or LAA. In patients with longitudinal data, we evaluated future cardiovascular events.
Results: 191 ischemic stroke patients (80 CE, 61 LAA, 50 ESUS) were included. Seven and 6 predictors positively associated with CE and LAA etiology, respectively. The c-statistic for discrimination between CE and LAA was 0.88. The strongest predictors for CE were left atrial volume index (OR = 2.17 per 1 SD increase) and BNP (OR = 1.83 per 1 SD increase), while the number of non-calcified stenoses ≥ 30% upstream (OR = 0.34 per 1 SD increase) and not upstream (OR = 0.74 per 1 SD increase) from the infarct were for LAA. When applied to ESUS cases, the model reclassified 40% (20/50), with 11/50 reclassified to CE and 9/50 reclassified to LAA. In 21/50 ESUS with 30-day cardiac monitoring, 1/4 in CE and 3/16 equivocal reclassifications registered cardiac events, while 0/1 LAA reclassifications showed events.
Conclusion: ML tools built using standard ischemic stroke workup clinical biomarkers can potentially reclassify ESUS stroke patients into cardioembolic or atherosclerotic etiology categories.
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Cardioembolism; Machine learning; Stroke.
© 2024. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: None.
References
-
- Hart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB et al (2014) Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol 13:429–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70310-7 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Martin MC, Sichtermann T, Schürmann K et al (2022) Classification of patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source into cardioembolic and non-cardioembolic profile subgroups. Eur J Neurol 29:2275–2282. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15356 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Zhang L, Guo Y, Zhou W et al (2022) Characteristics of non-stenotic carotid plaque in embolic stroke of undetermined source compared with cardiogenic embolism: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study. BMC Neurol 22:315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02846-4 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Diener HC, Sacco RL, Easton JD et al (2019) Dabigatran for prevention of stroke after embolic stroke of undetermined source. N Engl J Med 380:1906–1917. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1813959 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hart RG, Sharma M, Mundl H et al (2018) Rivaroxaban for stroke prevention after embolic stroke of undetermined source. N Engl J Med 378:2191–2201. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1802686 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical