Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 21;272(1):87.
doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12848-6.

Using clinical data to reclassify ESUS patients to large artery atherosclerotic or cardioembolic stroke mechanisms

Affiliations

Using clinical data to reclassify ESUS patients to large artery atherosclerotic or cardioembolic stroke mechanisms

Lauren Klein-Murrey et al. J Neurol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Embolic stroke of unidentified source (ESUS) represents 10-25% of all ischemic strokes. Our goal was to determine whether ESUS could be reclassified to cardioembolic (CE) or large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA) with machine learning (ML) using conventional clinical data.

Methods: We retrospectively collected conventional clinical features, including patient, imaging (MRI, CT/CTA), cardiac, and serum data from established cases of CE and LAA stroke, and factors with p < 0.2 in univariable analysis were used for creating a ML predictive tool. We then applied this tool to ESUS cases, with ≥ 75% likelihood serving as the threshold for reclassification to CE or LAA. In patients with longitudinal data, we evaluated future cardiovascular events.

Results: 191 ischemic stroke patients (80 CE, 61 LAA, 50 ESUS) were included. Seven and 6 predictors positively associated with CE and LAA etiology, respectively. The c-statistic for discrimination between CE and LAA was 0.88. The strongest predictors for CE were left atrial volume index (OR = 2.17 per 1 SD increase) and BNP (OR = 1.83 per 1 SD increase), while the number of non-calcified stenoses ≥ 30% upstream (OR = 0.34 per 1 SD increase) and not upstream (OR = 0.74 per 1 SD increase) from the infarct were for LAA. When applied to ESUS cases, the model reclassified 40% (20/50), with 11/50 reclassified to CE and 9/50 reclassified to LAA. In 21/50 ESUS with 30-day cardiac monitoring, 1/4 in CE and 3/16 equivocal reclassifications registered cardiac events, while 0/1 LAA reclassifications showed events.

Conclusion: ML tools built using standard ischemic stroke workup clinical biomarkers can potentially reclassify ESUS stroke patients into cardioembolic or atherosclerotic etiology categories.

Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Cardioembolism; Machine learning; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflicts of interest: None.

References

    1. Hart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB et al (2014) Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol 13:429–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(13)70310-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martin MC, Sichtermann T, Schürmann K et al (2022) Classification of patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source into cardioembolic and non-cardioembolic profile subgroups. Eur J Neurol 29:2275–2282. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15356 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang L, Guo Y, Zhou W et al (2022) Characteristics of non-stenotic carotid plaque in embolic stroke of undetermined source compared with cardiogenic embolism: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study. BMC Neurol 22:315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02846-4 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Diener HC, Sacco RL, Easton JD et al (2019) Dabigatran for prevention of stroke after embolic stroke of undetermined source. N Engl J Med 380:1906–1917. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1813959 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hart RG, Sharma M, Mundl H et al (2018) Rivaroxaban for stroke prevention after embolic stroke of undetermined source. N Engl J Med 378:2191–2201. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1802686 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources