Enabling electric field model of microscopically realistic brain
- PMID: 39710004
- PMCID: PMC11867869
- DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.12.1192
Enabling electric field model of microscopically realistic brain
Abstract
Background: Modeling brain stimulation at the microscopic scale may reveal new paradigms for various stimulation modalities.
Objective: We present the largest map to date of extracellular electric field distributions within a layer L2/L3 mouse primary visual cortex brain sample. This was enabled by the automated analysis of serial section electron microscopy images with improved handling of image defects, covering a volume of 250 × 140 × 90 μm³.
Methods: The map was obtained by applying a uniform brain stimulation electric field at three different polarizations and accurately computing microscopic field perturbations using the boundary element fast multipole method. We used the map to identify the effect of microscopic field perturbations on the activation thresholds of individual neurons. Previous relevant studies modeled a macroscopically homogeneous cortical volume.
Result: Our result shows that the microscopic field perturbations - an 'electric field spatial noise' with a mean value of zero - only modestly influence the macroscopically predicted stimulation field strengths necessary for neuronal activation. The thresholds do not change by more than 10 % on average.
Conclusion: Under the stated limitations and assumptions of our method, this result essentially justifies the conventional theory of "invisible" neurons embedded in a macroscopic brain model for transcranial magnetic and transcranial electrical stimulation. However, our result is solely sample-specific and is only relevant to this relatively small sample with 396 neurons. It largely neglects the effect of the microcapillary network. Furthermore, we only considered the uniform impressed field and a single-pulse stimulation time course.
Keywords: Biophysical modeling; Boundary element fast multipole method (BEM-FMM); Brain modeling at the microscopic scale; Brain stimulation; Electric field spatial noise; Multiscale brain modeling; Significance statement.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Sergey N. Makaroff reports financial support was provided by National Institute of Mental Health. Sergey N. Makaroff reports was provided by National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering. Aapo R. Nummenmaa reports financial support was provided by National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. Zhi-De Deng reports financial support was provided by National Institute of Mental Health. Hanbing Lu reports was provided by National Institutes of Health. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Update of
-
Enabling Electric Field Model of Microscopically Realistic Brain.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Nov 30:2024.04.04.588004. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.04.588004. bioRxiv. 2024. Update in: Brain Stimul. 2025 Jan-Feb;18(1):77-93. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.12.1192. PMID: 38645100 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
Similar articles
-
Enabling Electric Field Model of Microscopically Realistic Brain.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2024 Nov 30:2024.04.04.588004. doi: 10.1101/2024.04.04.588004. bioRxiv. 2024. Update in: Brain Stimul. 2025 Jan-Feb;18(1):77-93. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.12.1192. PMID: 38645100 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
-
Statistical method accounts for microscopic electric field distortions around neurons when simulating activation thresholds.Brain Stimul. 2025 Mar-Apr;18(2):280-286. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2025.02.007. Epub 2025 Feb 10. Brain Stimul. 2025. PMID: 39938863 Free PMC article.
-
Relation between the electric field and activation of cortical neurons in transcranial electrical stimulation.Brain Stimul. 2019 Mar-Apr;12(2):275-289. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Nov 10. Brain Stimul. 2019. PMID: 30449635
-
Preprocessing General Head Models for BEM-FMM Modeling Pertinent to Brain Stimulation.2020 Aug 6. In: Makarov SN, Noetscher GM, Nummenmaa A, editors. Brain and Human Body Modeling 2020: Computational Human Models Presented at EMBC 2019 and the BRAIN Initiative® 2019 Meeting [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2021. 2020 Aug 6. In: Makarov SN, Noetscher GM, Nummenmaa A, editors. Brain and Human Body Modeling 2020: Computational Human Models Presented at EMBC 2019 and the BRAIN Initiative® 2019 Meeting [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2021. PMID: 32966016 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Electric field-induced effects on neuronal cell biology accompanying dielectrophoretic trapping.Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2003;173:III-IX, 1-77. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55469-8. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2003. PMID: 12901336 Review.
Cited by
-
Statistical method accounts for microscopic electric field distortions around neurons when simulating activation thresholds.bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2025 Feb 5:2024.10.25.619982. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.25.619982. bioRxiv. 2025. Update in: Brain Stimul. 2025 Mar-Apr;18(2):280-286. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2025.02.007. PMID: 39484517 Free PMC article. Updated. Preprint.
References
-
- Siebner HR, Funke K, Aberra AS, Antal A, Bestmann S, Chen R, Classen J, Davare M, Di Lazzaro V, Fox PT, Hallett M, Karabanov AN, Kesselheim J, Beck MM, Koch G, Liebetanz D, Meunier S, Miniussi C, Paulus W, Peterchev AV, Popa T, Ridding MC, Thielscher A, Ziemann U, Rothwell JC, Ugawa Y. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: What is stimulated? - A consensus and critical position paper. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022. Aug;140:59–97. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.04.022. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Liu A, Vöröslakos M, Kronberg G, Henin S, Krause MR, Huang Y, Opitz A, Mehta A, Pack CC, Krekelberg B, Berényi A, Parra LC, Melloni L, Devinsky O, Buzsáki G. Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation. Nat Commun. 2018. Nov 30;9(1):5092. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07233-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lozano AM, Lipsman N, Bergman H, Brown P, Chabardes S, Chang JW, Matthews K, McIntyre CC, Schlaepfer TE, Schulder M, Temel Y, Volkmann J, Krauss JK. Deep brain stimulation: current challenges and future directions. Nat Rev Neurol. 2019. Mar;15(3):148–160. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0128-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Turner NL, Macrina T, Bae JA, Yang R, Wilson AM, Schneider-Mizell C, Lee K, Lu R, Wu J, Bodor AL, Bleckert AA, Brittain D, Froudarakis E, Dorkenwald S, Collman F, Kemnitz N, Ih D, Silversmith WM, Zung J, Zlateski A, Tartavull I, Yu SC, Popovych S, Mu S, Wong W, Jordan CS, Castro M, Buchanan J, Bumbarger DJ, Takeno M, Torres R, Mahalingam G, Elabbady L, Li Y, Cobos E, Zhou P, Suckow S, Becker L, Paninski L, Polleux F, Reimer J, Tolias AS, Reid RC, da Costa NM, Seung HS. Reconstruction of neocortex: Organelles, compartments, cells, circuits, and activity. Cell. 2022. Mar 17;185(6):1082–1100.e24. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.023. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources