Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 21;59(6):e868-e875.
doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1785663. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Internal Brace Augmentation Results in Fewer Reruptures Compared to Reconstruction without Augmentation

Affiliations

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Internal Brace Augmentation Results in Fewer Reruptures Compared to Reconstruction without Augmentation

João Victor Novaretti et al. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). .

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using autografts with and without internal brace augmentation. Methods Data from patients who underwent ACL reconstruction with hamstring and quadriceps tendon autografts, with a minimum follow-up of one year, with or without internal brace augmentation were collected prospectively analyzed retrospectively. The Lysholm and Tegner functional scores were collected before and after surgery, as well as data on postoperative complications. For the comparison of means of the two groups, we used the Student t test or the Mann-Whitney non-parametric test, when the assumption of normality of the data was rejected. Results In total, 55 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with internal brace augmentation and another 55 patients underwent ACL reconstruction without internal brace augmentation. The patients were aged between 16 and 63 years (mean of 32.7 ± 11.4 years). A total of 62 patients (56.4%) underwent ACL reconstruction with hamstring graft, and 19 patients (17.3%), with quadriceps tendon graft, with a diameter variation of 7 mm to 11 mm (mean of 8.95 ± 0.83 mm). The postoperative scores did not differ between the groups ( p > 0.05). Regarding the group submitted to ACL reconstruction with internal brace augmentation, 4 patients had complications: @ cases of arthrofibrosis, 2 (3.7%); 1 case of rerupture (1.8%); and 1 case of thrombosis (1.8%). In the group submitted to ACL reconstruction without augmentation, 7 patients manifested complications: 2 cases of arthrofibrosis (3.9%); 4 cases of rerupture (7.3%); and 1 case of infection (2%). Conclusion The results of the present study show that fewer cases of ACL rerupture were observed after reconstruction with internal brace augmentation when compared with ACL reconstruction without augmentation, although no differences in functional scores were found.

Keywords: anterior cruciate ligament; anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; knee injuries; treatment outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflito de Interesses Os autores não têm conflitos de interesses a declarar.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patients who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with internal brace augmentation.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Patients who underwent ACL reconstruction without internal brace augmentation.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Probe located between the graft and the internal brace augmentation.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Independent fixation with internal brace augmentation with anchor in the tibia and presence in the probe maintained in its position shown in Fig. 3 .
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Tegner score before and after surgery.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Lysholm score before and after surgery.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pacientes submetidos à reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) com aumento por cerclagem interna.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pacientes submetidos à reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) sem aumento por cerclagem interna.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Probe localizada entre o enxerto e o aumento por cerclagem interna.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fixação independente com aumento por cerclagem interna com âncora na tíbia e presença da probe mantida em sua posição mostrada na Fig. 3 .
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Escore de Tegner antes e depois da cirurgia.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Escore de Lysholm antes e depois da cirurgia.

Similar articles

References

    1. Gföller P, Abermann E, Runer A et al.Non-operative treatment of ACL injury is associated with opposing subjective and objective outcomes over 20 years of follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27(08):2665–2671. - PubMed
    1. Mai H T, Chun D S, Schneider A D et al.Performance-based outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in professional athletes differ between sports. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(10):2226–2232. - PubMed
    1. Paterno M V, Rauh M J, Schmitt L C, Ford K R, Hewett T E. Incidence of contralateral and ipsilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after primary ACL reconstruction and return to sport. Clin J Sport Med. 2012;22(02):116–121. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nwachukwu B U, Voleti P B, Berkanish P et al.Return to play and patient satisfaction after ACL reconstruction: Study with minimum 2-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(09):720–725. - PubMed
    1. Arnoczky S P, Tarvin G B, Marshall J L. Anterior cruciate ligament replacement using patellar tendon. An evaluation of graft revascularization in the dog. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(02):217–224. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources