Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 20:10:20552076241308439.
doi: 10.1177/20552076241308439. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.

A scoping review of the patient experience with wearable technology

Affiliations

A scoping review of the patient experience with wearable technology

Timothy Hoff et al. Digit Health. .

Abstract

Objective: This scoping review explores patients' experience with wearable technology. Its aims are to: (a) examine studies that contain empirical findings related to patients' experience with wearables; (b) compare these findings within and across studies; and (c) identify areas in need of greater understanding.

Methods: A Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping Review (PRISMA) guided approach was followed. Four databases of peer-reviewed articles (CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science) were searched for empirical articles involving patients' experience of using wearable technology. A standardized data abstraction form recorded relevant information on the articles identified. Data analysis included frequency counts for all abstracted categories; and itemized (by study) findings related to patients' wearable experience including satisfaction.

Results: Forty-six studies comprised the final review sample. The research literature examining patients' wearable experience is characterized by variety in terms of sample sizes, medical situations and wearable devices examined, research settings, and geographic location. This literature supports a positive patient experience with wearables in terms of satisfaction and usability, although the evidence is mixed when it comes to comfort. The moderate to higher satisfaction, usability, and comfort findings across studies do not suggest any sort of pattern with respect to the type of wearable, medical situation, or location.

Conclusions: The review findings suggest that health care organizations should view wearable technology as a viable complement to traditional aspects of patient care. However, from a patient experience standpoint, there is still much to know and validate in this regard, especially as the technology continues to advance.

Keywords: Wearable technology; comfort; patient experience; satisfaction; usability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram.

Similar articles

References

    1. Nova Advisor. U.S. Wearable Medical Devices Market. 2023. https://www.novaoneadvisor.com/report/us-wearable-medical-devices-market (accessed 22 July 2024).
    1. Goswami J. Technology Brings Care to Home for Chronically Ill Patients. 2020. https://www.healthcareitnews.com/blog/technology-brings-care-home-chroni... (accessed 22 July 2024).
    1. Vaidya A. How Connected Health Tech Bolsters Chronic Care, Behavioral Health. 2023. https://mhealthintelligence.com/features/how-connected-health-tech-bolst... (accessed 22 July 2024).
    1. Jo A, Coronel BD, Coakes CE, et al. Is there a benefit to patients using wearable devices such as fitbit or health apps on mobiles? A systematic review. Am J Med 2019; 132: 1394–1400. e1391. - PubMed
    1. Mattison G, Canfell O, Forrester D, et al. The influence of wearables on health care outcomes in chronic disease: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24: e36690. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources