Understanding Length of Stay in Recovery Homes
- PMID: 39712239
- PMCID: PMC11658391
- DOI: 10.1080/1533256X.2023.2215094
Understanding Length of Stay in Recovery Homes
Abstract
Abstinence-specific social support within dyadic relationships is one of the best post-treatment prognostic indicators of recovery and is probably responsible for much of the effectiveness of self-help group participation. Acute treatment after-care in the form of sober-living environments-i.e., recovery houses-provides many opportunities for recovering individuals to acquire such support. However, like most recovery settings, recovery homes do not work for everyone. The current study was based on a longitudinal study of 602 Oxford House residents of which this study focused on 155 who at their first assessment, or baseline, had been in residence for 2 months or less, and we tracked them over time to see how long they remained in the recovery homes. For new residents who had only been in the recovery homes for 1/2 weeks, the ultimate rate of departure was about 40%. However, for residents with 2 weeks of time during the first assessment, the rate of departure fell to about 31%. By the time a resident had 6 weeks of residence in the recovery homes, the hazard for leaving the homes had dropped to about 25%. In conclusion, the hazard of leaving the home over time dropped off rapidly as time in residence accumulated. In addition, having an important person from the recovery home in one's social network predicted lower hazard rates, given accumulated time in residence. The study indicates that the first few weeks in recovery homes are particularly vulnerable times for residents to leave prematurely, so more efforts are needed to better understand why some residents are able to maintain residency during these critical first weeks in these settings.
Keywords: Length of stay; Recovery Homes; Social Networks; Substance use disorders.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest with this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Six-month length of stay associated with better recovery outcomes among residents of sober living houses.Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2023 Sep 3;49(5):675-683. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2023.2245123. Epub 2023 Nov 28. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2023. PMID: 37782760
-
Personal and Environmental Social Capital Predictors of Relapse Following Departure from Recovery Homes.Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2021;28(5):504-510. doi: 10.1080/09687637.2020.1856787. Epub 2021 Feb 28. Drugs (Abingdon Engl). 2021. PMID: 34720462 Free PMC article.
-
Person-environment interactions among residents of Oxford Houses.Addict Res Theory. 2013;21(3):10.3109/16066359.2012.703270. doi: 10.3109/16066359.2012.703270. Addict Res Theory. 2013. PMID: 24273474 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between staff and quality of care in care homes: StaRQ mixed methods study.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Apr;12(8):1-139. doi: 10.3310/GWTT8143. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 38634535
-
Strategies for older people living in care homes to prevent urinary tract infection: the StOP UTI realist synthesis.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(68):1-139. doi: 10.3310/DADT3410. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 39432412 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Best D, Beckwith M, Haslam C, Haslam SA, Jetten J, Mawson E, & Lubman DI (2016) Overcoming alcohol and other drug addiction as a process of social identity transition: the social identity model of recovery (SIMOR), Addiction Research & Theory, 24:2, 111–123, DOI: 0.3109/16066359.2015.1075980
-
- Clifford PR, & Longabaugh R (1991). Manual for the administration of the Important People and Activities instrument: Project Match. Unpublished manual, Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI.
-
- Clifford PR, Longabaugh R, & Beattie M (1992). Social support and patient drinking: A validation study. Alcoholism and Clinical Experimental Research, 16, 403.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources