Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 6:15:1503154.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1503154. eCollection 2024.

Characterizing ADRs of Enfortumab vedotin and Erdafitinib in bladder cancer treatment: a descriptive analysis from WHO-VigiAccess

Affiliations

Characterizing ADRs of Enfortumab vedotin and Erdafitinib in bladder cancer treatment: a descriptive analysis from WHO-VigiAccess

Yuanbin Huang et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) and Erdafitinib are effective therapeutic drugs for bladder cancer patients following post-chemotherapy and immunotherapy. This study assessed adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from both drugs, comparing their safety profiles to guide clinical use.

Methods: A retrospective descriptive analysis was conducted on ADR reports for EV and Erdafitinib from the World Health Organization (WHO)-VigiAccess database. Data on patient demographics, system organ classes (SOCs), global patient regions, symptoms, and ADRs frequencies were analyzed and compared.

Results: As of 2024, 3,438 ADR reports were identified (2,257 for EV and 1,181 for Erdafitinib). The number of adverse reaction reports for EV is significantly higher than that for Erdafitinib. Among them, the SOC with the most adverse signals is gastrointestinal disorders, with the top five reports being nausea, gastrointestinal disorders, dry mouth, abdominal pain, and diarrhea. The top five reported adverse events (AEs) for EV are as follows: skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (20.70%), general disorders and administration site conditions (14.23%), nervous system disorders (11.12%), gastrointestinal disorders (7.78%), and metabolism and nutrition disorders (6.47%). In contrast, the top five AEs for Erdafitinib are: general disorders and administration site conditions (25.36%), skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (10.94%), gastrointestinal disorders (10.19%), eye disorders (9.21%), and injury poisoning and procedural complications (7.31%).

Conclusion: Our study identified and compared potential and novel ADRs between EV and Erdafitinib, providing key insights into their safety profiles and highlighting the need for personalized treatment strategies based on individual patient risk factors.

Keywords: Enfortumab vedotin; Erdafitinib; WHO-VigiAccess database; adverse drug reaction; pharmacovigilance; spontaneous reporting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Serious adverse events identified for EV and Erdafitinib using WHO-VigiAccess, including life-threatening events, hospitalization, and disease progression. The proportion of reports indicating serious adverse reactions is 3.56% for EV and 11.85% for Erdafitinib.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ajlan B. A., Alafif M. M., Alawi M. M., Akbar N. A., Aldigs E. K., Madani T. A. (2019). Assessment of the new World Health Organization's dengue classification for predicting severity of illness and level of healthcare required. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 13 (8), e0007144. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007144 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ascione C. M., Napolitano F., Esposito D., Servetto A., Belli S., Santaniello A., et al. (2023). Role of FGFR3 in bladder cancer: treatment landscape and future challenges. Cancer Treat. Rev. 115, 102530. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102530 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aso Y., Akaza H., Kotake T., Tsukamoto T., Imai K., Naito S. (1995). Preventive effect of a Lactobacillus casei preparation on the recurrence of superficial bladder cancer in a double-blind trial. The BLP Study Group. Eur. Urol. 27 (2), 104–109. 10.1159/000475138 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bader J. E., Voss K., Rathmell J. C. (2020). Targeting metabolism to improve the tumor microenvironment for cancer immunotherapy. Mol. Cell 78 (6), 1019–1033. 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.05.034 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bate A., Evans S. J. (2009). Quantitative signal detection using spontaneous ADR reporting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 18 (6), 427–436. 10.1002/pds.1742 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources