Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Nov 22;16(11):e74256.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.74256. eCollection 2024 Nov.

Role of Image-Free Robotic-Assisted Technology in Enhancing Accuracy of Implant Sizing for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Sanjay B Londhe  1 , Kunal Patel  1 , GovindKumar Baranwal  1 , Ashit Shah  2 , Dhruv Shah  2
Affiliations

Role of Image-Free Robotic-Assisted Technology in Enhancing Accuracy of Implant Sizing for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Sanjay B Londhe et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background The selection of properly sized implants is essential to achieve a well-balanced knee and favorable clinical outcomes following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). There is limited evidence in the literature regarding the effectiveness of robotic-assisted technology (RA-TKA) without imaging in accurately predicting implant sizes. Our aim was to provide an evidence-based assessment of this technology's accuracy in selecting appropriate implant sizes during robotic-assisted, image-free TKA. Methods This study included 50 consecutive patients who underwent image-free robotic-assisted primary TKA for end-stage knee osteoarthritis, excluding those with prior knee surgeries or undergoing revision TKA. The same surgical team performed all procedures using a medial parapatellar approach and an image-free robotic system with a handheld saw. Initial data from the first 10 cases showed 100% accuracy in implant size prediction. We calculated a sample size of 28 patients to achieve a 90% reduction in prediction error. Femoral registration points were marked (femur center, Whiteside's line, distal medial condyle, distal lateral condyle, posterior medial condyle, posterior lateral condyle, and anterior femur cortex), and implant sizing suggested by the robotic system was verified against trial components by an independent observer. Efficacy was compared with historical controls using the Chi-square test, with significance set at p<0.05. Results The image-free robotic system had an accuracy of 92% (46 out of 50) in predicting the exact femoral component and 100% (50 out of 50) accuracy in predicting ±1 size femur component. Compared to the historical control, the accuracy of implant size prediction using the image-free robotic system was statistically significant (Chi-square test, p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0021, respectively). Conclusion The findings from this study highlight the effectiveness of image-free robotic-assisted technology in achieving precise implant sizing during primary TKA for end-stage osteoarthritis over traditional approaches. The system's improved accuracy in femoral sizing suggests a potential shift toward more reliable, data-driven implant selection that could minimize intraoperative adjustments. By promoting a standardized approach to component fitting, image-free robotics may help optimize surgical consistency, thereby supporting better long-term implant performance and patient satisfaction. These results encourage further exploration into image-free robotic systems as a valuable tool in advancing knee arthroplasty outcomes.

Keywords: end-stage osteoarthritis; femoral component prediction; image-free robotic-assisted technology; implant sizing accuracy; surgical precision; total knee arthroplasty (tka).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. N/A issued approval N/A. Ethics committee approval was not needed as this being a retrospective observational study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Anatomic landmark points of femur.
Image Credit (Corresponding author): Dr. Sanjay B. Londhe
Figure 2
Figure 2. Manufacturer’s software showing femur implant size and tentative operative plan.
Image Credit (Corresponding author): Dr. Sanjay B. Londhe
Figure 3
Figure 3. Pre-adjustment captured gaps in 0-30-60-90 degrees of flexion.
Image Credit (Corresponding author): Dr. Sanjay B. Londhe
Figure 4
Figure 4. Post-adjustment captured gaps in full extension to full flexion.
Image Credit (Corresponding author): Dr. Sanjay B. Londhe
Figure 5
Figure 5. Post operative X-ray.
Image Credit (Corresponding author): Dr. Sanjay B. Londhe
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Three groups of dissatisfied patients exist after total knee arthroplasty: early, persistent, and late. Clement ND, Bardgett M, Weir D, Holland J, Gerrand C, Deehan DJ. Bone Joint J. 2018;100-B:161–169. - PubMed
    1. Patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of the literature. Gunaratne R, Pratt DN, Banda J, Fick DP, Khan RJ, Robertson BW. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:3854–3860. - PubMed
    1. Increased shape and size offerings of femoral components improve fit during total knee arthroplasty. Dai Y, Scuderi GR, Penninger C, Bischoff JE, Rosenberg A. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s00167-014-3163-6 Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;12:2931–2940. - PMC - PubMed
    1. In vivo tibial fit and rotational analysis of a customized, patient-specific TKA versus off-the-shelf TKA. Schroeder L, Martin G. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1055/s- 0038- 1653966 J Knee Surg. 2019;6:499–505. - PubMed
    1. Evaluation of painful total knee arthroplasty. Dennis DA. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. arth. 2004.03.003 J Arthroplasty. 2004;1:35–40. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources