Transitions and Resilience in Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Multiple Single-Case Study
- PMID: 39712925
- PMCID: PMC11660334
- DOI: 10.17505/jpor.2024.27102
Transitions and Resilience in Ecological Momentary Assessment: A Multiple Single-Case Study
Abstract
Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of affect, cognition and behavior aims to provide a 'window into a person's daily life'. But what should we look for through this window? In this paper, we compare a statistical perspective, grounded in probability theory, with a dynamic pattern perspective, grounded in complexity theory, on two common phenomena in EMA data: non-stationarity and outlying values. From a statistical perspective, these phenomena are considered nuisances that should be dealt with. From a dynamic pattern perspective, in contrast, non-stationarity may signal transitions from one dynamic pattern to another (e.g., a transition from a neutral to a persistent sad mood), whereas outlying values may signal recovery from perturbations (e.g., stressful life events). We evaluated the dynamic pattern view with a triangulation study of multiple single cases that took part in the Track your Mood EMA study, where participants reported on their emotions and daily events for 60 days. We found that non-stationarity was indeed related to a pattern transition, whereas outlying values were related to recovery after perturbations. These findings show that person-oriented EMA research would benefit from a dynamic pattern perspective that can identify highly meaningful and clinically relevant phenomena that are otherwise at risk of being missed. Complementing EMA time series with contextual information and qualitative data will be essential to genuinely understand these phenomena.
Keywords: affect dynamics; complex systems; ecological momentary assessment; experience sampling; non-stationarity; resilience; time series; transition.
© Person-Oriented Research.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Figures
References
-
- Baretta, D., Koch, S., Cobo, I., Castaño-Vinyals, G., De Cid, R., Carreras, A., Buekers, J., Garcia-Aymerich, J., Inauen, J., & Chevance, G. (2023). Resilience characterized and quantified from physical activity data: A tutorial in R. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 65, 102361. 10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102361 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Barta, W. D., Tennen, H., & Litt, M. D. (2012). Measurement reactivity in diary research. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 108–123). The Guilford Press.
-
- Cui, J., Hasselman, F., Olthof, M., & Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A. (2022). Illuminating the path: Examining the research methods of early warning signals in clinical psychology through a theoretical lens. 10.17605/OSF.IO/F659U - DOI
-
- Cui, J., Hasselman, F., Olthof, M., & Lichtwarck-Aschoff, A. (2024). Specifying transition types and scales of interest in understanding clinical change. PsyArxiv. 10.31234/osf.io/b68wh - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials