Provider's perspectives regarding transitional urologic care process: A scoping review
- PMID: 39713006
- PMCID: PMC11658119
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hctj.2023.100013
Provider's perspectives regarding transitional urologic care process: A scoping review
Abstract
Objective: To generate a scoping review that summarizes perceptions and attitudes of urology providers towards the transitional urologic care process. Likewise, summarize their identified barriers, facilitators, and ideal transition care for patients with genitourinary conditions.
Method: A systematic literature search was performed in Oct 2021. Records were identified for studies relevant to assessing urology specialists' practice variation, perception of barriers, and attitudes toward transitional care of patients needing life-long urologic care. The methodological quality of the cross-sectional studies was assessed using AXIS. The information extracted was clustered according to identified themes from the included studies. This scoping review was part of a systematic review registered on PROSPERO-(CRD42022306229).
Results: A total of 641 records were retrieved from electronic medical databases and cross-referencing. Ultimately, ten studies were included in this scoping review, conducted in the USA (n = 7), Canada, United Kingdom, and Italy. There is a wide variation in transitional care practices and preferences. However, the common themes extracted were: appropriate age to start the transition, additional training of the providers involved in transitional care, common transition plans, and practices, characteristics of multidisciplinary teams, potential barriers, areas of improvement, or facilitators for a better transitional process.
Conclusion: Common to all reports, multiple barriers are perceived. Areas that require improvement and multidisciplinary systems are needed to enhance urologic transition care. In addition, factors such as the age cut-off between pediatric and adult care or which specialist should handle specific procedures and conditions before, during, and after transition are still unclear and typically depend on the stakeholders.
Keywords: Providers survey; Scoping review; Transitional urologic care.
© 2023 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Scoping review of neurogenic bladder patient-reported readiness and experience following care in a transitional urology clinic.Neurourol Urodyn. 2022 Nov;41(8):1650-1658. doi: 10.1002/nau.25021. Epub 2022 Aug 2. Neurourol Urodyn. 2022. PMID: 35916108
-
Pediatric Urology Providers' Perceptions and Attitudes on Transitional Urologic Care in a Single-Payer Health Care System.Urol Pract. 2024 Sep;11(5):807-814. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000619. Epub 2024 May 17. Urol Pract. 2024. PMID: 38758200
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Current opinions regarding care of the mature pediatric urology patient.J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Oct;11(5):251.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 Jun 21. J Pediatr Urol. 2015. PMID: 26148437
-
Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(5):1-266. doi: 10.3310/PLTR9622. Health Technol Assess. 2024. PMID: 38343084 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wood D. Adolescent urology: developing lifelong care for congenital anomalies. Nat Rev Urol. 2014;11(5):289–296. - PubMed
-
- Woodhouse C.R. Adolescent and transitional urology-an introduction. Adolescent urology and long-term outcomes. 1st ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2015. p. 2.
-
- Miles J.A. John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2012. Management and organization theory: a Jossey-Bass reader.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources