Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 17:17:11161-11174.
doi: 10.2147/JIR.S500900. eCollection 2024.

Preoperative Albumin to Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio and Inflammatory Burden Index for Rectal Cancer Prognostic Nomogram-Construction: Based on Multiple Machine Learning

Affiliations

Preoperative Albumin to Alkaline Phosphatase Ratio and Inflammatory Burden Index for Rectal Cancer Prognostic Nomogram-Construction: Based on Multiple Machine Learning

Xiangyong Li et al. J Inflamm Res. .

Abstract

Purpose: Preoperative albumin to alkaline phosphatase ratio (AAPR) and inflammatory burden index (IBI) are prognostic indicators for a multitude of cancers, and our study focuses on evaluating the prognostic significance of the AAPR and the IBI on rectal cancer (RC) patients to provide a more accurate guideline for patient prognosis.

Patients and methods: This study enrolled patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery from January 2016 to January 2021. We utilized three machine learning approaches to select variables most relevant to prognosis in the training cohort. Finally, based on the screened variables, a nomogram was established to predict RC patients' overall survival (OS). The improvement in predictive ability and clinical benefit was assessed through the concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results: A total of 356 patients were enrolled and they were randomly divided into a training cohort (60%, n=214) and a validation cohort (40%, n=143). Overall survival (OS) was worse for patients in either the low AAPR or the high AAPR group, whereas patients in the low AAPR with both high IBI group had the lowest OS (P<0.001). Finally, five variables were obtained after screening the best variables by three machine learning, and the nomogram was constructed. In both the development and validation cohorts, the C-index values exceeded 0.85, indicating that the predictive model has a strong predictive performance in terms of overall survival. The calibration curves and the decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that the nomogram demonstrated a superior benefit.

Conclusion: Preoperative AAPR and IBI can serve as effective indicators for predicting the OS of RC patients. We have developed a nomogram for predicting the OS of patients who underwent laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.

Keywords: albumin to alkaline phosphatase ratio; inflammatory burden index; overall survival; prediction nomogram; rectal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of study design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for overall survival (OS) of rectal cancer patients classified according to AAPR cut-off values (P < 0.001). (B) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for OS of rectal cancer patients classified according to IBI cut-off values (P < 0.001). (C) Kaplan-Meier survival curves for OS of rectal cancer patients comparing different groups (P < 0.001).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Three important feature selection methods in ML are (A) Lasso regression; (B) Xgboost; and (C) Random Forest.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A Venn diagram showing three important feature selection methods in ML, with blue representing Lasso regression, yellow representing Xgboost, and pink representing Random Forest.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Nomogram model predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year OS in patients with RC.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The ROC curves of the nomogram for predicting 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) in rectal cancer patients in the training cohort (A), and the ROC curves of the nomogram for predicting 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS in rectal cancer patients in the validation cohort (B).
Figure 7
Figure 7
The calibration curves for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival (OS) in the training cohort (A) and the calibration curves for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS in the validation cohort (B). The solid line indicates the performance of the prediction model, and the closer to the diagonal dashed line, the more accurate the prediction.
Figure 8
Figure 8
The DCA curves for 1- (A), 3- (B), and 5-year (C) OS in the training cohort, as well as the DCA curves for 1- (D), 3 (E), and 5-year (F) OS in the validation cohort.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung HYA, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA-Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siegel RL, Wagle NS, Cercek A, Smith RA, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2023. CA-Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(3):233–254. doi:10.3322/caac.21772 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA-Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(2):93–99. doi:10.3322/caac.21388 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quirke P, Williams GT, Ectors N, Ensari A, Piard F, Nagtegaal I. The future of the TNM staging system in colorectal cancer: time for a debate? Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(7):651–657. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70205-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Akagi Y, et al. Optimal Colorectal Cancer Staging Criteria in TNM Classification. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(13):1519–1526. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.39.4692 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources