Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes in joint arthroplasty surgeries
- PMID: 39715181
- PMCID: PMC11666041
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314818
Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes in joint arthroplasty surgeries
Abstract
Background: This study aims to report and analyze disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) effect size (ES) variations, in patients undergoing major arthroplasty surgery.
Material and methods: All institution-based data of primary knee, hip, or shoulder arthroplasty patients at Turku University hospital (Finland) between January 2020 -December 2022 were collected, and treatment outcome assessed as a PROM difference between baseline and one-year follow-up. PROM ES were calculated for each patient and patient group separately, and patients with ES >0.5, were considered responders. Factors contributing to patient outcome and differences between patient groups were investigated using linear models and non-parametric methods.
Results: 2580 patients were operated (complete follow-up data on 1828 patients). 1110 (61%) of the patients were female, and mean age was 69 years (SD 10). The mean ES across all patient groups was 2.64 (SD 1.29) and the biggest ES was observed in shoulder patients and the smallest in knee patients. Smaller ES was statistically significantly associated with higher preoperative PROM, higher ASA class, and old age. The percentage of responders was highest for shoulder patients (97.7%), followed by hip patients (96.8%), and lowest for knee patients (92.5%).
Conclusion: The observed ES for joint arthroplasty surgeries is high. However, there are significant disparities among patients with primary knee, hip, and shoulder joint arthroplasty surgery. These variations are mainly due to differences in preoperative PROM score and may be attributed to differences in patient selection. We recommend that prior to shared decision-making, preoperative scores are thoroughly reviewed with the patient, along with other patient specific factors that may influence the end result of the treatment.
Copyright: © 2024 Äärimaa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
Ville Äärimaa has received grants from the Academy of Finland, the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, and the Turku University hospital. Ville Äärimaa has received payment for expert testimony given to National Patient Injury Board. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. Inari Laaksonen have received grants from the State Research Funding of Southwestern Finland. Turku University Hospital has supported Ville Äärimaa, and Inari Laaksonen to attend meetings and/or travel.
Figures
Similar articles
-
How do Patient-reported Outcome Scores in International Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Registries Compare?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1884-1896. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002306. Epub 2022 Jul 8. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022. PMID: 35901444 Free PMC article.
-
Poor Knee-specific and Generic Patient-reported Outcome Measure Scores at 6 Months Are Associated With Early Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Oct 1;480(10):1899-1909. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002301. Epub 2022 Jun 30. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022. PMID: 35901436 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Methods to Determine the Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Veterans Undergoing Elective Total Hip or Knee Arthroplasty in Veterans Health Administration Hospitals.JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):404-411. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0024. JAMA Surg. 2020. PMID: 32211842 Free PMC article.
-
A systematic review of crosswalks for converting patient-reported outcome measure scores in hip, knee, and shoulder replacement surgery.Acta Orthop. 2024 Sep 13;95:512-523. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.41384. Acta Orthop. 2024. PMID: 39268815 Free PMC article.
-
There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jan 1;481(1):63-80. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002440. Epub 2022 Oct 5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023. PMID: 36200846 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical