Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2024 Dec 23;19(12):e0314818.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314818. eCollection 2024.

Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes in joint arthroplasty surgeries

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes in joint arthroplasty surgeries

Ville Äärimaa et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: This study aims to report and analyze disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) effect size (ES) variations, in patients undergoing major arthroplasty surgery.

Material and methods: All institution-based data of primary knee, hip, or shoulder arthroplasty patients at Turku University hospital (Finland) between January 2020 -December 2022 were collected, and treatment outcome assessed as a PROM difference between baseline and one-year follow-up. PROM ES were calculated for each patient and patient group separately, and patients with ES >0.5, were considered responders. Factors contributing to patient outcome and differences between patient groups were investigated using linear models and non-parametric methods.

Results: 2580 patients were operated (complete follow-up data on 1828 patients). 1110 (61%) of the patients were female, and mean age was 69 years (SD 10). The mean ES across all patient groups was 2.64 (SD 1.29) and the biggest ES was observed in shoulder patients and the smallest in knee patients. Smaller ES was statistically significantly associated with higher preoperative PROM, higher ASA class, and old age. The percentage of responders was highest for shoulder patients (97.7%), followed by hip patients (96.8%), and lowest for knee patients (92.5%).

Conclusion: The observed ES for joint arthroplasty surgeries is high. However, there are significant disparities among patients with primary knee, hip, and shoulder joint arthroplasty surgery. These variations are mainly due to differences in preoperative PROM score and may be attributed to differences in patient selection. We recommend that prior to shared decision-making, preoperative scores are thoroughly reviewed with the patient, along with other patient specific factors that may influence the end result of the treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ville Äärimaa has received grants from the Academy of Finland, the Social Insurance Institution of Finland, and the Turku University hospital. Ville Äärimaa has received payment for expert testimony given to National Patient Injury Board. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. Inari Laaksonen have received grants from the State Research Funding of Southwestern Finland. Turku University Hospital has supported Ville Äärimaa, and Inari Laaksonen to attend meetings and/or travel.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PROM measurements for all patients included in the study before the operation (baseline) and at the 1-year follow-up mark.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Surgical outcomes measured as effect sizes for the patient groups included in the study.
Left plot for ASA = 2.

Similar articles

References

    1. Steinmetz JD, Culbreth GT, Haile LM, Rafferty Q, Lo J, Fukutaki KG, et al.. Global, regional, and national burden of osteoarthritis, 1990–2020 and projections to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Rheumatol. 2023;5(9). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP. Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the u.s., 2014 to 2030. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—American Volume. 2018;100(17). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01617 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilson I, Bohm E, Lübbeke A, Lyman S, Overgaard S, Rolfson O, et al.. Orthopaedic registries with patient-reported outcome measures. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4(6). doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.4.180080 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Harris K, Dawson J, Gibbons E, Lim C, Beard D, Fitzpatrick R, et al.. Systematic review of measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures used in patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016;Volume 7. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S97774 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dunbar MJ, Richardson G, Robertsson O. I can’t get no satisfaction after my total knee replacement: rhymes and reasons. Vols. 95-B, The bone & joint journal. 2013. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32767 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types