Comparison of Phenylephrine Bolus and Infusion Regimens on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes During Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 39715512
- DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000007156
Comparison of Phenylephrine Bolus and Infusion Regimens on Maternal and Fetal Outcomes During Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compare phenylephrine boluses versus prophylactic infusion in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia on feto-maternal outcomes.
Methods: Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and US Clinical registry databases were searched. Studies comparing phenylephrine boluses (both therapeutic and prophylactic) with infusion (both fixed- and variable-rate) assessing various feto-maternal outcomes were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of maternal hypotension. Secondary maternal outcomes included the incidence of reactive hypertension, bradycardia, nausea, or vomiting; secondary neonatal outcomes included umbilical arterial pH, partial pressure of oxygen (paO2), umbilical venous pH, fetal acidosis, Apgar Scores at 1 and 5 minutes. All outcomes were quantitatively analyzed using the random effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration R0B 2.0 tool.
Results: We included 15 studies with 2153 parturients. The parturients receiving phenylephrine bolus during cesarean delivery under spinal or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia had a significant increase in the incidence of predelivery hypotension compared to phenylephrine infusion (risk ratio [RR], 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72-3.18). Reactive hypertension (RR, 0.48, 95% CI, 0.29-0.79) and bradycardia (RR, 0.57, 95% CI, 0.41-0.79) were less common in the parturients receiving phenylephrine bolus; whereas, vomiting (RR, 2.15, 95% CI, 1.53-3.03) was more common compared to the infusion group. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of nausea or any fetal outcomes (umbilical artery pH, paO2, umbilical venous pH, fetal acidosis, and Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes) between either of the groups. Three studies had a high risk of bias.
Conclusions: A prophylactic phenylephrine infusion significantly reduces the incidence of predelivery hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia in comparison to the therapeutic or prophylactic phenylephrine bolus group. A prophylactic phenylephrine infusion may be considered in all parturients without preexisting hypertensive disorder or cardiovascular disorders to reduce the risk of predelivery hypotension. More evidence is needed to guide optimal hemodynamic management for patients with hypertensive or cardiovascular disorders.
Copyright © 2024 International Anesthesia Research Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest, Funding: Please see DISCLOSURES at the end of this article.
Similar articles
-
[Ephedrine vs. phenylephrine by intravenous bolus and continuous infusion to prevent hypotension secondary to spinal anesthesia during cesarean section: a randomized comparative trial].Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2011 Aug-Sep;58(7):412-6. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(11)70104-9. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2011. PMID: 22046862 Clinical Trial. Spanish.
-
A randomized trial comparing prophylactic phenylephrine and ephedrine infusion during spinal anesthesia for emergency cesarean delivery in cases of acute fetal compromise.J Clin Anesth. 2016 Nov;34:208-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.03.015. Epub 2016 May 12. J Clin Anesth. 2016. PMID: 27687377 Clinical Trial.
-
Intravenous initial bolus during prophylactic norepinephrine infusion to prevent spinal hypotension for cesarean delivery: A randomized controlled, dose-finding trial.J Clin Anesth. 2024 Oct;97:111562. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111562. Epub 2024 Jul 23. J Clin Anesth. 2024. PMID: 39047530 Clinical Trial.
-
Phenylephrine vs ephedrine in cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Int J Surg. 2018 Dec;60:48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.10.039. Epub 2018 Oct 31. Int J Surg. 2018. PMID: 30389535
-
Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32619039 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Effect of preoperative oxytocin infusion on haemodynamics among women undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia: A randomised controlled study.Indian J Anaesth. 2025 Apr;69(4):343-349. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_1062_24. Epub 2025 Mar 13. Indian J Anaesth. 2025. PMID: 40687978 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bower JR, Kinsella SM. Preventing and treating hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. BJA Educ. 2020;20:360–361.
-
- Kinsella SM, Carvalho B, Dyer RA, et al.; Consensus Statement Collaborators. International consensus statement on the management of hypotension with vasopressors during caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2018;73:71–92.
-
- Šklebar I, Bujas T, Habek D. Spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension in obstetrics: prevention and therapy. Acta Clin Croat. 2019;58(suppl 1):90–95.
-
- Chooi C, Cox JJ, Lumb RS, et al. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;7:CD002251.
-
- Assen S, Jemal B, Tesfaye A. Effectiveness of leg elevation to prevent spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during cesarean delivery in the resource-limited area: open randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2020;2020:5014916.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical