Surgical parameters affecting procedure duration of hysteroscopic fibroid resection: results of a retrospective longitudinal study
- PMID: 39715840
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07877-5
Surgical parameters affecting procedure duration of hysteroscopic fibroid resection: results of a retrospective longitudinal study
Abstract
Purpose: To identify and analyze the main surgical parameters affecting the operative time of hysteroscopic fibroid resection.
Methods: This retrospective observational study included 65 cases of outpatient hysteroscopic fibroid resection performed between March 2021 and May 2023 in outpatient office setting. Patients aged 18-50 with various indications such as infertility, recurrent pregnancy loss, or abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) were included. The operative time, fibroid size, FIGO classification, and fibroid localization were recorded and analyzed using ANOVA, Chi-square test, and linear regression models.
Results: The average operative duration for all surgeries was 557.41 (± 449.52) s. A significant correlation between fibroid size and operative time was found in FIGO 0 (p = 0.0003) and FIGO 1 (p < 0.0001) subgroups, with weaker correlation in FIGO II (p = 0.039). FIGO I surgeries took significantly longer than FIGO 0 (p = 0.044), and fundal fibroids were associated with longer operative times compared to posterior fibroids (p = 0.0329).
Conclusion: The size and FIGO classification of fibroids significantly influence operative time during hysteroscopic resection. Smaller and more accessible fibroids (FIGO 0 and 1) are resected faster than those embedded deeper in the uterine wall (FIGO 2). Detailed preoperative evaluation of fibroid characteristics can better predict operative time, aiding in patient preparation and optimized analgesia and perioperative planning as well as optimizing the use of operating theater. Further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to validate these findings and explore additional influencing factors.
Keywords: Bleeding; Fibroid; Hysteroscopy; Infertility; Pain; Resection.
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose regarding this publication. Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Debrecen: (DE KK RKEB.IKEB. 6342–2023). Consent to participate: Informed consent was obtained from all the individual participants included in the study. Consent to publish: Not applicable.
Similar articles
-
Hysteroscopic myomectomy for submucosal type 2 fibroids with cold enucleation technique and complete fibroid extraction using a double-lumen intracervical cannula.Fertil Steril. 2021 Feb;115(2):522-524. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.028. Epub 2020 Dec 4. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 33272627
-
Hysteroscopic intrauterine morcellation of submucosal fibroids: preliminary results in Hong Kong and comparisons with conventional hysteroscopic monopolar loop resection.Hong Kong Med J. 2016 Feb;22(1):56-61. doi: 10.12809/hkmj154600. Epub 2016 Jan 8. Hong Kong Med J. 2016. PMID: 26744122
-
Outcome of magnetic resonance-Guided focused ultrasound surgery (MRgFUS) for FIGO class 1 fibroids.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Feb;221:119-122. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.12.025. Epub 2017 Dec 14. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018. PMID: 29288921
-
New hysteroscopic techniques for submucosal uterine fibroids.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Aug;26(4):308-13. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000076. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24950124 Review.
-
[Results of hysteroscopic myomectomy].Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2004 Sep;32(9):825-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2004.08.007. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2004. PMID: 15380769 Review. French.
Cited by
-
Approach to abnormal uterine bleeding in presence of endometrial polyps with new hysteroscopic devices.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jul;312(1):257-265. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08005-7. Epub 2025 Mar 29. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 40156637 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sparic R, Mirkovic L, Malvasi A, Tinelli A (2016) Epidemiology of uterine myomas: a review. Int J Fertil Steril 9:424–435 - PubMed
-
- Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Fraser IS, FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee (2018) The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 143(3):393–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12666 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Somigliana E, Reschini M, Bonanni V, Busnelli A, Li Piani L, Vercellini P (2021) Fibroids and natural fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 43(1):100–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.03.013 . (Epub 2021 Mar 23 PMID: 33903032) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pritts EA, Parker WH, Olive DL (2009) Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertil Steril 91(4):1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.01.051 . (Epub 2008 Mar 12 PMID: 18339376) - DOI - PubMed
-
- Urman B, Yakin K, Ertas S, Alper E, Aksakal E, Riemma G, Angioni S, Vitale SG (2024) Fertility and anatomical outcomes following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: an 11-year retrospective cohort study to validate a new classification system for intrauterine adhesions (Urman-Vitale Classification System). Int J Gynaecol Obstet 165(2):644–654. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15262 . (PMID: 38013507) - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical