Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun;263(6):1719-1724.
doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06720-6. Epub 2024 Dec 23.

Protective eyewear in children with one eye vision loss: compliance and trends

Tal Yahalomi  1   2 , Daphna Mezad-Koursh  3   4 , Amir Sternfeld  4   5 , Miriam Ehrenberg  4   5 , Anat Bachar Zipori  3   4 , Gad Dotan  6   7
Affiliations

Protective eyewear in children with one eye vision loss: compliance and trends

Tal Yahalomi et al. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Safety glasses are an important measure to prevent blindness, especially in one- eyed patients. However, patient compliance with eye protection is often limited. Unlike previous studies that described protective eyewear wearing in anophthalmic patients, this study analyzed their usage in functionally one-eyed children, having a significantly reduced visual acuity in one eye, determining common obstacles to their use.

Methods: A survey-based study analyzing protective eyewear usage in children with one eye vision loss (mean logarithm of the Minimum Angle of Resolution (logMAR) visual acuity ≤ 0.7).

Results: This study included 83 functionally one-eyed children (44 males), who received a recommendation to wear safety glasses. Ninety-nine percent of their caregivers were aware of this recommendation; however, 31% of them did not know the glasses' true purpose. Regarding actual usage, only 29 (35%) children wore safety glasses at least 90% of the day, 26 (31%) children wore them part-time (10-90% of the day) and 28 (34%) wore them rarely or never at all (< 10% of the day). Compliance was higher when glasses provided optical correction. Reasons provided for non-compliance included: discomfort, appearance, cost and vision reduction. Many respondents recollected incidents in which the glasses prevented an eye injury, and less commonly an eye injury occurring while the child was not wearing eye protection.

Conclusions: Compliance with safety glasses in functionally one-eyed children is limited. Emphasizing that numerous gaps and barriers need to be bridged to improve eyewear protection in these children to prevent trauma in the better-seeing eye with its devastating lifestyle effect.

Key messages: WHAT IS KNOWN : Anophthalmic patients often do not wear protective glasses, which are needed to prevent trauma to their only remaining eye.

What is new: Non-anophthalmic children with reduced visual acuity in one eye use protective glasses even less often, even when doing sports. Common reasons for not wearing safety glasses include: discomfort, dislike of self-appearance with glasses, and lens-induced vision reduction.

Keywords: One-eye vision loss; Protective eyewear; Protective glasses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the (Schneider Medical Center and Tel Aviv Medical Center) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Schneider Medical Center approval number RMC 0375–18 and Tel Aviv Medical Center approval number TLV 0154–18. Informed consent: A telephone Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study. Conflict of interest: None of the authors have any conflict of interest to disclose. All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Safety glasses compliance according to the percent of the day used. Numbers indicate number of children belonging to each group
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Reasons provided for non-compliance with protective eyewear
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Brophy M, Sinclair SA, Hostetler SG, Xiang H (2006) Pediatric eye injury-related hospitalizations in the United States. Pediatrics 117(6):e1263–e1271 - PubMed
    1. Jandeck C, Kellner U, Bornfeld N, Foerster MH (2000) Open globe injuries in children. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 238(5):420–426 - PubMed
    1. Grin TR, Nelson LB, Jeffers JB (1987) Eye injuries in childhood. Pediatrics 80(1):13–17 - PubMed
    1. Turbert M (2023) Children’s Eye injuries: prevention and care: American Academy of Ophthalmology.Available from: https://www.aao.org/eye-health/tips-prevention/injuries-children. Accessed 18 Apr 2024
    1. Tommila V, Tarkkanen A (1981) Incidence of loss of vision in the healthy eye in amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 65(8):575–577 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources