Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):849.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07079-6.

Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus using early-pregnancy data: a secondary analysis from a prospective cohort study in Iran

Affiliations

Prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus using early-pregnancy data: a secondary analysis from a prospective cohort study in Iran

Mohammadamin Parsaei et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Early identification of gestational diabetes mellitus is essential for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. While risk factors such as advanced maternal age, elevated pre-pregnancy body mass index, multiparity, and a history of gestational diabetes have been recognized, the role of serum biomarkers remains uncertain. This study explores the predictive value of early-pregnancy laboratory findings in conjunction with maternal demographic and clinical characteristics for gestational diabetes mellitus.

Methods: Early-pregnancy data from the first pregnancy visits at 6-12 weeks of gestation from women in the Mothers and Children's Health cohort were collected. Comprehensive maternal demographic data (e.g., age and body mass index) and obstetrics history (e.g., gravidity, parity, miscarriage, intrauterine growth retardation, gestational diabetes mellitus, and preeclampsia) were recorded. Maternal blood samples were analyzed for complete blood count and biochemistry parameters. Gestational diabetes mellitus was diagnosed based on 75-g oral glucose tolerance test results between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation, following the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. Multivariate logistic regression analysis assessed the predictive capacity of various variables. Receiver operating curve analysis was conducted to identify optimal predictive cut-offs for continuous variables.

Results: 1,565 pregnant women with a mean age of 32.6 ± 5.7 years, mean body mass index of 25.5 ± 4.9 kg/m², mean gravidity of 1.1 ± 1.1, and mean parity of 0.8 ± 0.8 were included. 297 pregnancies (19.0%) were complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus. In the multivariate analysis, higher maternal age (p < 0.001, odds ratio = 1.076 [1.035-1.118]), a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (p < 0.001, odds ratio = 3.007 [1.787-5.060]) and preeclampsia (p = 0.007, odds ratio = 2.710 [1.310-5.604]), and elevated early-pregnancy fasting blood sugar (p < 0.001, odds ratio = 1.062 [1.042-1.083]) emerged as independent predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus. Moreover, the receiver operating curve yielded an optimal cut-off of 89.5 mg/dL for early-pregnancy fasting blood sugar in predicting gestational diabetes mellitus.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that, in addition to established risk factors, a history of preeclampsia and elevated early-pregnancy fasting blood glucose are independent predictors of gestational diabetes mellitus. Therefore, close monitoring of pregnant women with these risk factors in early pregnancy is warranted to facilitate timely diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, reducing the burden of gestational diabetes.

Trial registration: Not applicable.

Keywords: Fasting blood sugar; Gestational diabetes mellitus; Prediction; Pregnancy complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The MATCH cohort study protocol received approval from the institutional review board and ethical committee of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences on October 12, 2019, under reference code IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC.1398.576 (available at https://ethics.research.ac.ir/PortalCommittee.php?code=IR.TUMS.MEDICINE.REC ). Also, prior to enrollment, participants received explicit verbal and written explanations of the study, and informed consent was obtained for both participation and the anonymous publication of their data. Participants were allowed to withdraw from the study at any stage without affecting their routine prenatal or postnatal care. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The flow diagram for the participant enrollment process
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Illustration of ROC curve analysis on the predictability of GDM based on the maternal FBS level in the first visit during the early pregnancy

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Alejandro EU, Mamerto TP, Chung G, Villavieja A, Gaus NL, Morgan E, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus: a harbinger of the vicious cycle of diabetes. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(14):5003. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valadan M, Bahramnezhad Z, Golshahi F, Feizabad E. The role of first-trimester HbA1c in the early detection of gestational diabetes. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Metzger B, Lowe L, Dyer A, Trimble E, Chaovari «dr U, Cousta, «DR, et al. The HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(19):1991–2002. - PubMed
    1. Wei Y, He A, Tang C, Liu H, Li L, Yang X, et al. Risk prediction models of gestational diabetes mellitus before 16 gestational weeks. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):889. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mistry SK, Das Gupta R, Alam S, Kaur K, Shamim AA, Puthussery S. Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and adverse pregnancy outcome in South Asia: a systematic review. Endocrinol Diabetes Metabolism. 2021;4(4):e00285. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources