Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):1642.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12130-5.

A methodological research for development and psychometric properties of a new Measure to Assess Health Literate Organization (MAHLO-76) in hospital settings

Affiliations

A methodological research for development and psychometric properties of a new Measure to Assess Health Literate Organization (MAHLO-76) in hospital settings

Bahrambeygi Fatemeh et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Toward delivering appropriately safe, high quality and effective health care, healthcare organization should be health literate. This paper presents the development and psychometrics of an instrument for assessing the attributes of a health literate hospital which is called MAHLO-76 (Measure to Assess Health Literate Organization) here by authors.

Methods: The current study is methodological research which is involved two phases of tool development and psychometric evaluation. MAHLO primary item pool was prepared using the data extracted from the semi-structured, in-depth interviews and literature review. The face and content validity were evaluated applying qualitative and quantitative approaches. Exploratory factor analysis with varimax rotation after Bartlett sphericity and KMO tests was used to evaluate the construct validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to evaluate the structural factors, applying the most common goodness-of-fit indices. In order to determine internal consistency and test-retest stability, Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient were calculated respectively.

Results: The initial tool after checking for duplicates and excluding was contained 79 items. In terms of face validity, 3 items were modified using qualitative method and none of the items had an impact score of less than 1.5. In the qualitative content validity assessment, 16 items were revised and none of the items had CVR score less than 0.59 and CVI score less than 0.79. The results of the EFA obtained from the KMO showed the adequacy of the sample size (KMO value = 0.884) and the Bartlett's sphericity test showed a significant correlation between the items (χ2 = 38124.040, df = 3081, P < 0.0001). The exploratory factor analysis indicated that 14 initially extracted factors explained 63.716% of the total variance. In Confirmatory factor analysis, the chi-square was 205.016 and other model fit indices including NFI:0.812, NNFI:0.875, CFI:0.919, IFI:0.921, MFI:0.857, GFI:0.930, AGFI:0.918, RMR:0.051, RMSEA:0.06 were calculated. In reliability assessment, Cronbach's alpha was 0.94 and the value of ICC was 0.98.

Conclusion: Measure to Assess Health Literate Organization (MAHLO-76) is a valid and reliable instrument that can be used as assessment as well as self-assessment tool in hospital settings. Its application could disclosure those organizational health literacy aspects in clinical environments that need necessary interventions.

Keywords: Health literacy; Health literate organization; Hospital; Psychometric; Tool development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The researchers observed all the ethical codes including informed consent, confidentiality, plagiarism, double publication, date manipulation, and fake data generation. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and received approval ethical research code from ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (Approval ID: IR. SBMU. PHNS. REC.1400.054: Approval Date: 2021–09–14). It should be noted that, informed consent was obtained from all participants. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart for development and psychometrics of MAHLO-76
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scree plot (the eigenvalues of components in MAHLO-76)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Confirmatory factor analysis diagram of MAHLO-76. HLOP: Health Literacy -Oriented Programs. DIUMP: Diverse and Innovative Understandable Media Provision. SBM: Safety-Based Management. LAS: Literacy Appropriate Services. WTPE: Workforce Training for Patient Education. HLOL: Health Literacy-Oriented Leadership. CICI: Clear Information on Costs and Insurances. RC: Respecting Clients. HPA: Health Promoting Approach. HLOWT: Health Literacy-Oriented Workforce Training. PS: Participatory Services. IC: Interpersonal Communication. FAIS: Facilitating Access to Information and Services

Similar articles

References

    1. Nutbeam D. Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st century. Health Promot Int. 2000;15(3):259–67.
    1. Peerson A, Saunders M. Health literacy revisited: what do we mean and why does it matter? Health Promot Int. 2009;24(3):285–96. - PubMed
    1. Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, Doyle G, Pelikan J, Slonska Z, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):80–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudd RE, Anderson JE, Oppenheimer S, Nath C. Health literacy: an update of medical and public health literature. In: Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, Volume 7. New York: Routledge; 2023. p. 175–204.
    1. Ancker JS, Grossman LV, Benda NC. Health literacy 2030: is it time to redefine the term? J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(1):2427–30. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources