Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Dec 23;24(1):852.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07081-y.

Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation on the incidence of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of vitamin D supplementation on the incidence of preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Khaled Moghib et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia is a severe pregnancy complication affecting 2-8% of pregnancies globally, contributing to substantial maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia, yet the efficacy of its supplementation during pregnancy in reducing preeclampsia incidence remains uncertain.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of vitamin D supplementation on the incidence of preeclampsia and related maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Method: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science until August 2024 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the effects of vitamin D supplementation on preeclampsia. Eligible studies included pregnant women with varying doses of vitamin D supplementation compared to placebo or standard care. Primary outcomes were the incidence of pre-eclampsia and preterm labor; secondary outcomes included serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, low birth weight, and APGAR scores. Data were synthesized using R statistical software, with effect measures reported as relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results: A total of 33 RCTs involving 10,613 participants were included. Vitamin D supplementation significantly reduced the risk of preeclampsia by 44.8% (RR = 0.55, 95% CI [0.43, 0.71], P < 0.0001) and preterm labor by 30% (RR = 0.70, 95% CI [0.51, 0.96], P = 0.0286). Subgroup analyses indicated that the benefits were more pronounced when the control group received a placebo rather than low-dose vitamin D. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels significantly increased in the supplementation group (MD = 32.42 nmol/L, 95% CI [20.33, 44.50], P < 0.0001). However, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of low birth weight (RR = 0.65, 95% CI [0.42, 1.02], P = 0.057) or Apgar scores at 5 min (MD = 0.20, 95% CI [-0.01, 0.40], P = 0.057).

Conclusion: Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy significantly reduces the risk of preeclampsia and preterm labor, though its impact on neonatal outcomes remains unclear. These findings underscore the potential value of vitamin D supplementation in prenatal care for improving maternal outcomes. Further research is needed to clarify its effects on neonatal health.

Keywords: Meta-analysis; Preeclampsia; Pregnancy; Preterm labor; Systematic review; Vitamin D.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval: Not applicable. Consent to Publish: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prisma flow diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
‘Risk of bias graph’: review authors’ judgments about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies, and ‘Risk of bias summary’: review authors’ judgments about each risk of bias item for each included study
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Incidence of Preeclampsia between Vit. D Supplementation and Control groups. *Moderate deficiency in Vit. D **Severe deficiency in Vit. D. IN/LD: intervention vs. low dose. IN/P: intervention vs. placebo
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Incidence of preterm labor between Vit. D supplementation and control groups. *Moderate deficiency in Vit. D **Severe deficiency in Vit. D. IN/LD: intervention vs. low dose. IN/P: intervention vs. placebo
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Measurement of 25-OH between Vit. D supplementation and control groups. * lowest dose for intervention. ** Another group with a higher dose
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Low birth weight between Vit. D supplementation and control group
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Low Apgar score at 5 min between Vit. D supplementation and control group
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Publication bias graph

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Macedo TCC, Montagna E, Trevisan CM, Zaia V, de Oliveira R, Barbosa CP, et al. Prevalence of preeclampsia and eclampsia in adolescent pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 291,247 adolescents worldwide since 1969. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;248:177–86. - PubMed
    1. ACOG. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG practice bulletin, number 222. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(6):e237–60. - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin 203: chronic hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(1):e26–50. - PubMed
    1. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371(9606):75–84. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nirupama R, Divyashree S, Janhavi P, Muthukumar SP, Ravindra PV. Preeclampsia: pathophysiology and management. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021;50(2):101975. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources