Readiness planning: how to go beyond "buy-in" to achieve curricular success and front-line performance
- PMID: 39716251
- PMCID: PMC11667836
- DOI: 10.1186/s41077-024-00317-z
Readiness planning: how to go beyond "buy-in" to achieve curricular success and front-line performance
Abstract
Simulation program staff and leadership often struggle to partner with front-line healthcare workers, their managers, and health system leaders. Simulation-based learning programs are too often seen as burdensome add-ons rather than essential mechanisms supporting clinical workforce readiness. Healthcare system leaders grappling with declining morale, economic pressure, and too few qualified staff often don't see how simulation can help them, and we simulation program leaders can't seem to bridge this gap. Without clear guidance from front-line clinicians and leaders, the challenge of building and maintaining sustainably relevant simulation offerings can seem overwhelming. We argue that three blind spots have limited our ability to see the path to collaborations that support front-line workforce readiness: We wrongly assume that our rigor in designing and delivering programs will lead to front-line participant engagement and positive impact, we overestimate the existence of shared priorities, mindsets, and expertise with our would-be partners, and we contribute to building a façade of superficial education compliance that distracts from vital skill development. How do we design simulation-based training programs that are valued, supported, and sustained by key partners over time? (1) By seeing ourselves as partners first and designers second; (2) by using a boundary spanning design process that shifts the primary psychological ownership of training outcomes to our partners; and (3) by focusing this shared design process on workforce readiness for the situations that our healthcare partners care about most. Drawing on lessons from more than 800 readiness plans developed by participants in our courses and the authors' successes and mistakes in partnering with healthcare teams for front-line readiness, we introduce the concepts, commitments, and practices of "readiness planning" along with three detailed examples of readiness planning in action.
Keywords: Change leadership; Clinical outcomes; Curriculum design; Healthcare quality; Patient safety; Simulation; Training design.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Workforce Readiness Training: A Comprehensive Training Model That Equips Community Health Workers to Work at the Top of Their Practice and Profession.Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 8;9:673208. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.673208. eCollection 2021. Front Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34169058 Free PMC article.
-
The development and evaluation of the Designing for Dissemination and Implementation Learning Hub.Transl Behav Med. 2024 Nov 16;14(11):653-660. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae036. Transl Behav Med. 2024. PMID: 39298683
-
The RISE (Resilience in Stressful Events) Peer Support Program: Creating a Virtuous Cycle of Healthcare Leadership Support for Staff Resilience and Well-Being.J Healthc Leadersh. 2024 Dec 9;16:537-542. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S487709. eCollection 2024. J Healthc Leadersh. 2024. PMID: 39679177 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nursing education: current themes, puzzles and paradoxes.Commun Nurs Res. 2007 Spring;40:3-14. Commun Nurs Res. 2007. PMID: 17900063 Review.
References
-
- Khamis NN, Satava RM, Alnassar SA, Kern DE. A stepwise model for simulation-based curriculum development for clinical skills, a modification of the six-step approach. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(1):279–87. 10.1007/s00464-015-4206-x[publishedOnlineFirst:20150422]. - PubMed
-
- Thomas P, Kern D, Hughes M, et al. Curriculum development for medical education: a six-step approach. 4th ed. Baltimore, MA: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2022.
-
- Petrosoniak A, Hicks C, Barratt L, et al. Design thinking-informed simulation: an innovative framework to test, evaluate, and modify new clinical infrastructure. Simul Healthc. 2020;15(3):205–13. 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000408. - PubMed
-
- Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York The Free Press 2003.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous