Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jan;47(1):e13870.
doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13870.

The Role of Boundary Spanning in Building Trust: A Place-Based Study on Engaging Hardly Reached Groups in Community Healthcare Settings

Affiliations

The Role of Boundary Spanning in Building Trust: A Place-Based Study on Engaging Hardly Reached Groups in Community Healthcare Settings

Lara Bianchi et al. Sociol Health Illn. 2025 Jan.

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of boundary spanning activities on building trust as a means of tackling health inequalities in hardly reached communities. Lack of trust has been identified as a barrier to engagement with healthcare services, resulting in poorer health outcomes. Engaging with hardly reached communities is challenging due to the social and symbolic boundaries prevalent in community healthcare settings. Drawing on empirical data from a recent year-long collaborative research project with communities from seven economically deprived areas in the City of Nottingham, we identify two boundary spanning activities that facilitate the development of trust: communication across boundaries and intergroup relationship building. By cross fertilising sociological accounts on trust with insights derived from philosophy, the study finds that for hardly reached communities, trusting relevant individuals is more potent and widespread than the trust they have in healthcare institutions. By developing individual trust, hardly reached communities are more likely to consequently perceive the existence of institutional goodwill and competence. This counter-intuitive finding invites us to regard trust as context specific and relational rather than as a binary choice between trusting individuals or institutions and to situate cross boundary activities focused on trust development within the power asymmetries in which they unfold.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organisation or entity with any financial interest or non‐financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Similar articles

References

    1. Anderson, C. and Kirkpatrick S.. 2016. “Narrative Interviewing.” International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 38: 631–634. - PubMed
    1. Aoun, S. M. , Abel J., Rumbold B., et al. 2020. “The Compassionate Communities Connectors Model for End‐of‐Life Care: A Community and Health Service Partnership in Western Australia.” Palliative Care and Social Practice 14. 10.1177/2632352420935130. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bishop, S. and Waring J.. 2019. “From Boundary Object to Boundary Subject; the Role of the Patient in Coordination Across Complex Systems of Care During Hospital Discharge.” Social Science & Medicine 235: 112370. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112370. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bradby, H. , Lindenmeyer A., Phillimore J., Padilla B. and Brand T.. 2020. “‘If There Were Doctors Who Could Understand Our Problems, I Would Already Be Better’: Dissatisfactory Health Care and Marginalisation in Superdiverse Neighbourhoods.” Sociology of Health & Illness 42, no. 4: 739–757. 10.1111/1467-9566.13061. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Braun, V. and Clarke V.. 2022. Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.

LinkOut - more resources