Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 23:15248399241306409.
doi: 10.1177/15248399241306409. Online ahead of print.

Colorectal Cancer Messaging and Gaps in Knowledge Among Screening-Eligible Individuals

Affiliations

Colorectal Cancer Messaging and Gaps in Knowledge Among Screening-Eligible Individuals

Ginny E Kincaid et al. Health Promot Pract. .

Abstract

Shifts in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, including guidance from the United States Preventive Services Task Force lowering the recommended screening age from 50 to 45 years in 2021, may leave gaps in clinicians' understanding of related barriers and beliefs held by patients. This study uses the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework to analyze factors influencing CRC screening uptake among individuals aged 44-54 years and identifies how gaps in knowledge intersect with screening barriers, particularly as they relate to the health care system and sociocultural environment. In 2022, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Division of Cancer Prevention and Control's Screen for Life campaign conducted 12 online focus groups to gather audience insights and test materials. Researchers conducted the focus groups in English and Spanish with individuals aged 44-54 years who had never had CRC and had never received a CRC screening. Focus groups gauged participants' knowledge, awareness, and behavior pertaining to CRC and CRC screening. Results show that participants often lacked knowledge about risk factors and screening modalities and appreciated emotionally resonant communication approaches that addressed gaps in knowledge using demystifying, destigmatizing language and representative imagery. Findings also indicate a need to help patients overcome barriers related to insurance coverage, treatment options, and discrimination. Results may guide the development of future health promotion efforts and empower health care providers to approach conversations with their patients with additional context regarding patients' needs.

Keywords: behavior change; cancer prevention and control; colorectal cancer; health disparities; health promotion; qualitative research; social determinants of health; social marketing/health communication.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahmed NU, Pelletier V, Winter K, & Albatineh AN (2013). Factors explaining racial/ethnic disparities in rates of physician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening. American Journal of Public Health, 103(7), e91–e99. 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301034 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alsan M, & Wanamaker M (2018). Tuskegee and the health of Black men. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(1), 407–455. 10.1093/qje/qjx029 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atkinson TM, Salz T, Touza KK, Li Y, & Hay JL (2015). Does colorectal cancer risk perception predict screening behavior? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38(6), 837–850. 10.1007/s10865-015-9668-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brandzel S, Chang E, Tuzzio L, Campbell C, Coronado N, Bowles EJA, Bradford SC, & Buist DSM (2017). Latina and Black/African American women’s perspectives on cancer screening and cancer screening reminders. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 4(5), 1000–1008. 10.1007/s40615-016-0304-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brenner AT, Hoffman R, McWilliams A, Pignone MP, Rhyne RL, Tapp H, Weaver MA, Callan D, de Hernandez BU, Harbi K, & Reuland DS (2016). Colorectal cancer screening in vulnerable patients: Promoting informed and shared decisions. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 51(4), 454–462. 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.03.025 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources