Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 26;27(1):euae305.
doi: 10.1093/europace/euae305.

Stereotactic cardiac radiotherapy for refractory ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease patients: a systematic review

Affiliations

Stereotactic cardiac radiotherapy for refractory ventricular tachycardia in structural heart disease patients: a systematic review

Amulya Gupta et al. Europace. .

Abstract

Aims: Among patients with structural heart disease with ventricular tachycardia (VT) refractory to medical therapy and catheter ablation, cardiac stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a paradigm-changing treatment option. This study aims to assess the efficacy of cardiac SBRT in refractory VT by comparing the rates of VT episodes, anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) therapies, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks post-SBRT with pre-SBRT.

Methods and results: We performed a comprehensive literature search and included all clinical studies reporting outcomes on cardiac SBRT for VT. Treatment efficacy was evaluated as random-effects pooled rate-ratios of VT episodes, ATP therapies and ICD shocks post-SBRT (after 6-week blanking) and pre-SBRT, with patients serving as their own controls. Post-SBRT overall survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier method. We included 23 studies published 2017-24 reporting on 225 patients who received cardiac SBRT, with median follow-up 5.8-28 months. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies for all three efficacy endpoints (P < 0.00001). The random-effects pooled rate-ratios of VT episodes, ATP therapies and ICD shocks post- vs. pre-SBRT were 0.10 (95% CI 0.06, 0.16), 0.09 (0.05, 0.15), and 0.09 (0.05, 0.17), respectively (all P < 0.00001). The most common reported complications included pericardial (8.0%, including 0.9% late oesophagogastro-pericardial fistula) and pulmonary (5.8%). There was no change in left ventricular ejection fraction post-SBRT (P = 0.3) but some studies reported an increase in mitral regurgitation. The combined 3-, 12-, and 24-month overall patient survival was 0.86 (0.80, 0.90), 0.72 (0.65, 0.78), and 0.57 (0.47, 0.67), respectively.

Conclusion: Among patients with refractory VT in context of structural heart disease, VT burden and ICD shocks are dramatically reduced following cardiac SBRT. The overall mortality in this population with heart failure and refractory VT receiving palliative cardiac SBRT remains high.

Keywords: Cardiac; Meta-analysis; Radioablation; Radiotherapy; SABR; SBRT; STAR; Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy; Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation; Stereotactic body radiotherapy; VT; Ventricular tachycardia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Meta-analyses forest plots depicting the rate-ratios of (A) VT episodes, (B) ATP therapies, and (C) ICD shocks post- (excluding blanking period) vs. pre-SBRT.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier curves with 95% CI depicting (A) overall survival, (B) recurrent VT (post-blanking)-free survival, (C) ICD shock (post-blanking)-free survival, and (D) redo catheter ablation/SBRT-free survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic representation of the effect of cardiac SBRT on VT outcomes and post-treatment overall survival. VT, ventricular tachycardia; ATP, anti-tachycardia pacing; ICD, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; SBRT, stereotactic body radiotherapy.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005;352:225–37. - PubMed
    1. Poole JE, Johnson GW, Hellkamp AS, Anderson J, Callans DJ, Raitt MH et al. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med 2008;359:1009–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moss AJ, Schuger C, Beck CA, Brown MW, Cannom DS, Daubert JP et al. Reduction in inappropriate therapy and mortality through ICD programming. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2275–83. - PubMed
    1. Connolly SJ, Dorian P, Roberts RS, Gent M, Bailin S, Fain ES et al. Comparison of beta-blockers, amiodarone plus beta-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the OPTIC study: a randomized trial. JAMA 2006;295:165–71. - PubMed
    1. Tung R, Vaseghi M, Frankel DS, Vergara P, Di Biase L, Nagashima K et al. Freedom from recurrent ventricular tachycardia after catheter ablation is associated with improved survival in patients with structural heart disease: an International VT Ablation Center Collaborative Group study. Heart Rhythm 2015;12:1997–2007. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources