Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 9:15:1502321.
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1502321. eCollection 2024.

The waist-to-height ratio is a good predictor for insulin resistance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Affiliations

The waist-to-height ratio is a good predictor for insulin resistance in women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Mengyi Zhu et al. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). .

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore the role of the waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) in assessing insulin resistance (IR) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

Materials and methods: We enrolled 882 PCOS-afflicted women in a cross-sectional analysis to evaluate the association of the WHtR with IR. Their demographic characteristics, anthropometric parameters, and fasting blood samples were collected and measured. Moreover, IR was evaluated by homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). We estimated the relationship between the WHtR and IR and the cut-off thresholds of the WHtR for IR using multivariable linear regression and logistic regression models, respectively.

Results: The prevalence rate of IR was 51.9%. The patients with PCOS and IR displayed significantly increased values for body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), WHtR, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), free androgen index (FAI), HOMA-IR, total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and apolipoprotein B (ApoB). However, the patients with PCOS and IR showed a reduction in estradiol (E2), luteinizing hormone (LH), LH/FSH ratio, sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) values than those without IR. Moreover, BMI (log-transformed), WC, and HOMA-IR (log-transformed) were positively correlated with the WHtR. When adjusting for potential confounding variables, the WHtR was significantly associated with HOMA-IR (log-transformed), with a standardized regression coefficient of 0.271. Furthermore, the WHtR was significantly associated with an increased risk of IR, with the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 3.15 (WHtR multiplied by 10). Additionally, the WHtR helped to identify IR in women with PCOS with an optimal cut-off point of 0.519 (Youden index = 0.433).

Conclusions: The WHtR had a positive association with IR in women with PCOS. Hence, we suggest that the WHtR, as a simple, practical, and reliable anthropometric measure, can be used to predict the risk of IR in patients with PCOS.

Keywords: anthropometric measurements; insulin resistance; polycystic ovary syndrome; prediction; waist-to-height ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Correlation of Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR) with Log[Body Mass Index (BMI)], Waist Circumference (WC), Log[Waist-to-Hip Ratio (WHR)], and Log(HOMA-IR) for Insulin Resistance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under receiver operating characteristic curves for the detection of IR using WHtR. (B) Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under receiver operating characteristic curves for the detection of IR using BMI. (C) Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under receiver operating characteristic curves for the detection of IR using WHR. (D) Receiver operating characteristic curves and area under receiver operating characteristic curves for the detection of IR using WC.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lizneva D, Suturina L, Walker W, Brakta S, Gavrilova-Jordan L, Azziz R. Criteria, prevalence, and phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. (2016) 106:6–15. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.05.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Armanini D, Boscaro M, Bordin L, Sabbadin C. Controversies in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of PCOS: focus on insulin resistance, inflammation, and hyperandrogenism. Int J Mol Sci. (2022) 23:4110. doi: 10.3390/ijms23084110 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osibogun O, Ogunmoroti O, Michos ED. Polycystic ovary syndrome and cardiometabolic risk: Opportunities for cardiovascular disease prevention. Trends Cardiovasc Med. (2020) 30:399–404. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2019.08.010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sanchez-Garrido MA, Tena-Sempere M. Metabolic dysfunction in polycystic ovary syndrome: Pathogenic role of androgen excess and potential therapeutic strategies. Mol Metab. (2020) 35:100937. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2020.01.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee S-H, Park S-Y, Choi CS. Insulin resistance: from mechanisms to therapeutic strategies. Diabetes Metab J. (2022) 46:15–37. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0280 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources