The effect of early warning scoring systems on adverse outcome in surgical patients: A systematic review
- PMID: 39717155
- PMCID: PMC11665940
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100256
The effect of early warning scoring systems on adverse outcome in surgical patients: A systematic review
Abstract
Background: An early warning scoring system aims to detect clinical deterioration at an early stage and prevent failure-to-rescue in hospitalized patients. In this systematic review we studied the effect of an early warning scoring system on adverse outcome in surgical patients.
Methods: This review was conducted and reported according to PRISMA and the protocol of this review is registered at PROSPERO, under the registration number CRD42018107799. PubMed, Embase.com, CINAHL (Ebsco) and Wiley/Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to 20-06-2023 for randomized controlled trials and non-randomized studies of interventions. Studies were eligible for inclusion if the effect of an early warning scoring system using spot check monitoring was studied.
Results: Eight articles were included, of which two were randomised controlled trials. The overall risk of bias was high. A statistically significant decrease in mortality was seen in three studies. Two studies reported a decrease in cardiopulmonary arrests, and three studies found a decrease in ICU-admissions. There was heterogeneity among studies regarding the types of complications that were reported.
Conclusions: The evidence in favor of an early warning scoring system to reduce complications and mortality in surgical patients is low, mainly due to a limited number of studies and poor study design. Well-designed trials are needed to investigate whether an early warning scoring system improves outcome in surgical patients.
Keywords: Cardiopulmonary arrest; Clinical deterioration; Early Warning Score; Failure to rescue; Mortality; Outcome assessment; Patient acuity; Surgical patients; Systematic review.
© 2024 The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
None.
References
-
- Bunkenborg G., Samuelson K., Poulsen I., Ladelund S., Åkeson J. Lower incidence of unexpected in-hospital death after interprofessional implementation of a bedside track-and-trigger system. Resuscitation. 2014;85:424–430. - PubMed
-
- De Meester K., Haegdorens F., Monsieurs K.G., Verpooten G.A., Holvoet A., Van Bogaert P. Six-day postoperative impact of a standardized nurse observation and escalation protocol: a preintervention and postintervention study. J. Crit. Care. 2013;28:1068–1074. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
