Choosing the Correct Guide Video on Central Venous Catheter Placement From YouTube
- PMID: 39717524
- PMCID: PMC11665741
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76102
Choosing the Correct Guide Video on Central Venous Catheter Placement From YouTube
Abstract
Objective Proper preparation is necessary before performing certain procedures on a patient. Recently, videos created using social media content have been used as a preparation method. This has become particularly important in medical education since the COVID-19 pandemic. Central venous catheter placement is an important procedure performed in critically ill patients. This study assessed the quality of videos about central venous catheter placement available on YouTube. Methods A search was conducted on YouTube with the keyword "central venous catheter placement" on June 1, 2024. The review process involved two independent medical experts who comprehensively assessed the relevance and content of each video. To assess the quality of the videos, the DISCERN score, mDISCERN score, Global Quality Score (GQS), and American Medical Association Journal (JAMA) rating scale were used as evaluation tools. Results Top 41 English-language videos deemed most relevant were evaluated, each with over 25,000 views. Analysis of the video sources revealed that 36.6% of the videos were uploaded by doctors. Moreover, 87.8% of the videos were audio narrations accompanied by real patients or mannequins, and the remaining videos comprised audio narration with animated images. The mean JAMA score of the videos was 1.73, the mean mDISCERN score was 2.66, the mean DISCERN score was 40.46, and the mean GQS score was 3.8. A statistically significant difference was observed between the mDISCERN scores of videos containing real visual content and those containing animated visual content (p = 0.038). Moreover, the same two groups also exhibited higher quality scores in the GQS (p = 0.029). Conclusion The quality of information related to central venous catheter placement on YouTube is highly variable. Specifically, videos that provide valuable information and those that have the potential to mislead viewers do not have a noticeable difference in terms of views and popularity. For a medical practitioner or physician seeking reliable information, a useful and safe approach is preferring videos uploaded by medical professionals. It is important to prioritize the professional identity of the content creator rather than the video's popularity or the number of comments it has received.
Keywords: central line placement; medicine education; quality; video analysis; youtube.
Copyright © 2024, Ağaçkıran et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Human subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve human participants or tissue. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Hepatosteatosis.Cureus. 2023 Oct 11;15(10):e46843. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46843. eCollection 2023 Oct. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37829652 Free PMC article.
-
An analysis of YouTube videos about restless leg syndrome: Choosing the right guide.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 20;102(42):e35633. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035633. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 37861537 Free PMC article.
-
Quality of online video resources concerning patient education for neck pain: A YouTube-based quality-control study.Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;10:972348. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.972348. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 36211682 Free PMC article.
-
YouTube as a source of education on tunneled catheter insertion: content and quality analysis.BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 15;24(1):1318. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06330-0. BMC Med Educ. 2024. PMID: 39548462 Free PMC article.
-
A quality assessment of YouTube content on shoulder instability.Phys Sportsmed. 2022 Aug;50(4):289-294. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2021.1942286. Epub 2021 Jun 24. Phys Sportsmed. 2022. PMID: 34121601 Review.
References
-
- The risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection with femoral venous catheters as compared to subclavian and internal jugular venous catheters: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Marik PE, Flemmer M, Harrison W. Crit Care Med. 2012;40:2479–2485. - PubMed
-
- Intravascular complications of central venous catheterization by insertion site. Parienti JJ, Mongardon N, Mégarbane B, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1220–1229. - PubMed
-
- Upper body venous access for transvenous lead placement--review of existent techniques. Lau EW. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007;30:901–909. - PubMed
-
- Hemodynamic monitoring for the evaluation and treatment of shock: what is the current state of the art? Suess EM, Pinsky MR. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;36:890–898. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources