Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 9:6:1459684.
doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1459684. eCollection 2024.

Patients' suggestions for improvements to text-based e-consultations. An online survey of users of the national health portal in Norway

Eli Kristiansen  1   2 , Helen Atherton  3 , Trine Strand Bergmo  1 , Paolo Zanaboni  1
Affiliations

Patients' suggestions for improvements to text-based e-consultations. An online survey of users of the national health portal in Norway

Eli Kristiansen et al. Front Digit Health. .

Abstract

Background: In recent years, text-based e-consultations have been widely implemented in general practice and are appreciated by patients for their convenience and efficiency. Policymakers aim to enhance patient access to clinical services with the general practitioner (GP) through text-based e-consultations. However, concerns are raised about their efficiency and security. We aimed to investigate users' perceptions of potential improvements in the text-based e-consultation service provided by the national health portal in Norway.

Method: We conducted an online survey among users of text-based e-consultations with the GP on the national health portal Helsenorge. The survey was available from January-February 2023 and consisted of 20 questions. This study focused on the free-text answers to the question "Do you have any suggestions to improve the service?" The framework method was used for a thematic analysis of the answers.

Results: The analysis of 2,954 free-text answers from users of the national e-consultation service resulted in six areas where suggestions for improvement were expressed. According to users, the service would benefit from: (1) a better set-up to facilitate the formulation of the patient's problem, (2) better value for money (in regards to both price and quality), (3) faster response time, (4) improved information and predictability about the status of the e-consultation (e.g., if it is received and when to expect an answer), (5) improvement in technical issues, and (6) improvement of access to dialogue-based services to replace or complement e-consultations.

Conclusion: The analysis of users' suggestions for improvements to the e-consultation service emphasised the need to customise the service to address individual patient needs. Users found a one-size-fits-all approach with mandatory questions, fixed pricing, and inflexible response times less appreciated. Some also felt forced to rely on e-consultations due to the perceived poor availability of other GP services. This highlights the importance of perceiving e-consultations not as a replacement for dialogue-enabled services, but rather as a potentially efficient addition, ensuring a well-tailored setup for appropriate patient use.

Keywords: e-consultation; general practitioner; patient feedback; primary healthcare; remote consultation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of respondents to free text answer.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Suggestions for potential improvement within each key area.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Erku D, Khatri R, Endalamaw A, Wolka E, Nigatu F, Zewdie A, et al. Digital health interventions to improve access to and quality of primary health care services: a scoping review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2023) 20(19):6854. 10.3390/ijerph20196854 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silva C, Lopes RH, de Goes Bay O, Jr, Martiniano CS, Fuentealba-Torres M, Arcêncio RA, et al. Digital health opportunities to improve primary health care in the context of COVID-19: scoping review. JMIR Hum Factors. (2022) 9(2):e35380. 10.2196/35380 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zanaboni P, Fagerlund AJ. Patients’ use and experiences with e-consultation and other digital health services with their general practitioner in Norway: results from an online survey. BMJ Open. (2020) 10(6):e034773. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034773 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Folkehelseinstituttet. Statistikk om allmenlegetjenester. Available online at: https://www.fhi.no/he/kpr/statistikk-og-rapporter/#fastleger (accessed November 03, 2024).
    1. Kristiansen E, Atherton H, Austad B, Bergmo T, Norberg BL, Zanaboni P. Older patients’ experiences of access to and use of e-consultations with the general practitioner in Norway: an interview study. Scand J Prim Health Care. (2023) 41(1):33–42. 10.1080/02813432.2022.2161307 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources