Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Apr;28(2):379-399.
doi: 10.1111/ocr.12888. Epub 2024 Dec 24.

Prevalence, Incidence and Risk Factors of White Spot Lesions Associated With Orthodontic Treatment - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevalence, Incidence and Risk Factors of White Spot Lesions Associated With Orthodontic Treatment - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Umar Hussain et al. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025 Apr.

Abstract

The primary objective was to systematically assess the prevalence, incidence and risk factors of WSLs with orthodontic treatment. The secondary objective was to compare the prevalence of WSLs between conventional fixed appliances (CFA) and other appliances, as well as with no treatment. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACs, Virtual Health Library and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB-2, ROBINS-I tool and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. Random-effects meta-analyses of pooled proportions and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were conducted, followed by meta-regressions, sensitivity analyses, and an assessment of the quality of evidence using GRADE. Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA) was performed to determine the conclusiveness of the evidence. Fifty-seven studies involving 9101 patients (mean age of 16.4 years, 33.5% male) were included. Among orthodontic patients, the pooled prevalence of WSLs was 55.06% (95% CI: 47.7%, 63.6%: 42 studies), incidence was 34.2% (95% CI: 27.6%, 40.6%: 44 studies) and surface prevalence was 26.9% (6 studies; 95% CI: 13.8%, 39.8%). Among non-treated patients, the pooled prevalence of WSLs was 29.1% (95% CI: 17.2%, 41.1%; 21 studies). The odds of WSLs were significantly higher, with CFA being 4.73 times greater compared to other appliances (OR = 4.7, 95% CI: 1, 19.2, p = 0.05) and seven times higher compared to no treatment (OR = 7, 95% CI: 2.6, 18.5, p = 0.001). Prevalence of WSLs increased with longer treatment duration (p < 0.001), varied with ethnicity, being highest in Africans and lowest in Americans (p < 0.05), and method of detection (p < 00.1). TSA confirmed that CFA leads to more WSLs than other appliances or no treatment, with future studies unlikely to alter the direction of the outcomes. Orthodontic treatment increases WSL prevalence, influenced by various factors. Clinicians should carefully consider the development of WSLs during orthodontic treatment and adjust treatment plans accordingly, choose appliances wisely and monitor with effective detection tools. Since one-third of untreated cases already have WSLs, proper documentation at treatment start is essential. Trail Registration: CRD42023478065.

Keywords: clear aligner; fixed appliance; lingual appliances; orthodontic treatment; white spot lesions.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. A. K. Wu, C. McGrath, R. W. Wong, D. Wiechmann, and A. B. M. Rabie, “A Comparison of Pain Experienced by Patients Treated With Labial and Lingual Orthodontic Appliances,” European Journal of Orthodontics 32, no. 4 (2010): 403–407.
    1. S. Alami, K. Khamlich, I. Khazi, F. Bourzgui, M. Hamza, and F. El Quars, “Orthodontists' Perceived Satisfaction With Aligner Treatment,” Open Access Library Journal 10, no. 6 (2023): 1–12.
    1. H. Hu, C. Feng, Z. Jiang, et al., “Effectiveness of Remineralizing Agents in the Prevention and Reversal of Orthodontically Induced White Spot Lesions: A Systematic Review and Network Meta‐Analysis,” Clinical Oral Investigations 24 (2020): 4153–4167.
    1. D. Shungin, A. I. Olsson, and M. Persson, “Orthodontic Treatment‐Related White Spot Lesions: A 14‐Year Prospective Quantitative Follow‐Up, Including Bonding Material Assessment,” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 138, no. 2 (2010): 136.e1–8.
    1. M. Knösel, E. Klang, H.‐J. Helms, and D. Wiechmann, “Occurrence and Severity of Enamel Decalcification Adjacent to Bracket Bases and Sub‐Bracket Lesions During Orthodontic Treatment With Two Different Lingual Appliances,” European Journal of Orthodontics 38, no. 5 (2016): 485–492.