Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec 24;37(1):3.
doi: 10.1007/s40520-024-02890-9.

Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society

Affiliations

Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society

Yeisson Rivero-Moreno et al. Aging Clin Exp Res. .

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to assess and compare outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) in patients under and over 70 years old, performed by a fellowship-trained robotic surgeon at a single institution.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing robotic primary transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair between 2020 and 2022 was conducted. Patients were categorized into two age groups: those under 70 years and 70 years and older. Data were collected through chart reviews with a mean follow-up of 30 days. Concurrently, a systematic review (SR) of relevant high-level literature was carried out.

Results: Among the 37 patients studied, 75.7% (n = 28) were male, with a mean age of 64.8 years. Demographic features did not significantly differ based on age groups. Patients > 70 years had a higher incidence of reported complications (52.3% vs. 87.5%, p < 0.461). There were no differences in operative time or length of stay between the groups. In the SR, only 23.7% (n = 9) of studies provided age-related conclusions. Three studies identified age over 70 as a risk factor for postoperative complications, while two studies suggested that RIHR is feasible and safe in patients aged 80 years and older.

Conclusion: Patients over 70 years old demonstrated a higher incidence of complications compared to younger patients. However, current literature indicates that the robotic approach may offer a safe and minimally invasive option for inguinal hernia repair in both younger and older adults.

Keywords: Age groups; Inguinal hernia; Postoperative complications; Robotic surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the institutional review board from Houston Methodist Hospital under IRB #PRO00031398. Consent for publication: Not applicable.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Search outputs based on PRISMA guidelines [18]

References

    1. Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K (2003) Hernias: inguinal and incisional. The Lancet 362:1561–1571. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14746-0 - PubMed
    1. The HerniaSurge Group (2018) International guidelines for groin hernia management. Hernia 22:1–165. 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khandalavala K, Shimon T, Flores L, et al (2020) Emerging surgical robotic technology: a progression toward microbots. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 5:3–3. 10.21037/ales.2019.10.02
    1. Jung S, Lee JH, Lee HS (2023) Early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective single-institution study in Korea. J Minim Invas Surg 26:128–133. 10.7602/jmis.2023.26.3.128 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Peltrini R, Corcione F, Pacella D et al (2023) Robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 37:1188–1193. 10.1007/s00464-022-09614-y - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources