Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society
- PMID: 39718673
- PMCID: PMC11668831
- DOI: 10.1007/s40520-024-02890-9
Clinical outcomes from robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in patients under and over 70 years old: a single institution retrospective cohort study with a comprehensive systematic review on behalf of TROGSS - The Robotic Global Surgical Society
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to assess and compare outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair (RIHR) in patients under and over 70 years old, performed by a fellowship-trained robotic surgeon at a single institution.
Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing robotic primary transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair between 2020 and 2022 was conducted. Patients were categorized into two age groups: those under 70 years and 70 years and older. Data were collected through chart reviews with a mean follow-up of 30 days. Concurrently, a systematic review (SR) of relevant high-level literature was carried out.
Results: Among the 37 patients studied, 75.7% (n = 28) were male, with a mean age of 64.8 years. Demographic features did not significantly differ based on age groups. Patients > 70 years had a higher incidence of reported complications (52.3% vs. 87.5%, p < 0.461). There were no differences in operative time or length of stay between the groups. In the SR, only 23.7% (n = 9) of studies provided age-related conclusions. Three studies identified age over 70 as a risk factor for postoperative complications, while two studies suggested that RIHR is feasible and safe in patients aged 80 years and older.
Conclusion: Patients over 70 years old demonstrated a higher incidence of complications compared to younger patients. However, current literature indicates that the robotic approach may offer a safe and minimally invasive option for inguinal hernia repair in both younger and older adults.
Keywords: Age groups; Inguinal hernia; Postoperative complications; Robotic surgery.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethical approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the institutional review board from Houston Methodist Hospital under IRB #PRO00031398. Consent for publication: Not applicable.
Figures
References
-
- Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K (2003) Hernias: inguinal and incisional. The Lancet 362:1561–1571. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14746-0 - PubMed
-
- Khandalavala K, Shimon T, Flores L, et al (2020) Emerging surgical robotic technology: a progression toward microbots. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 5:3–3. 10.21037/ales.2019.10.02
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
