Cephalomedullary Nailing for Subtrochanteric and Reverse-Oblique Femoral Fractures: Comparison of a Single Versus Dual Lag Screw Device
- PMID: 39719000
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.24.00404
Cephalomedullary Nailing for Subtrochanteric and Reverse-Oblique Femoral Fractures: Comparison of a Single Versus Dual Lag Screw Device
Abstract
Background: Subtrochanteric proximal femoral fractures are generally treated with cephalomedullary nail fixation. We aimed to compare outcomes of subtrochanteric fracture fixation using a single lag screw (Gamma3 nail, GN) or dual lag screw (INTERTAN nail, IN) device.
Methods: The primary outcome measure was mechanical failure, defined as lag screw cut-out or back-out, nail breakage, or peri-implant fracture. Secondary outcomes included reoperation for mechanical failure, deep infection, or nonunion, and technical predictors of mechanical failure. Adult patients (≥18 years of age) with a subtrochanteric proximal femoral fracture treated at a single center were retrospectively identified using electronic records. All patients who underwent fixation using either a long GN (November 2010 to January 2017) or IN (March 2017 to April 2022) were included. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to identify operative complications.
Results: A total of 587 patients were included: 336 in the GN group (median age, 82 years; 73% female) and 251 in the IN group (median age, 82 years; 71% female). The risk of mechanical failure was 3-fold higher in the GN group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.87; p = 0.010), with screw cut-out (p = 0.04) and back-out (p = 0.04) only observed in the GN group. We observed a greater risk of reoperation for mechanical failure in the GN group, but this did not achieve significance (aHR, 2.02; p = 0.16). Independent predictors of mechanical failure included varus malalignment of >5° for cut-out (aHR, 17.43; p = 0.012), a tip-to-apex distance of >25 mm for back-out (aHR, 9.47; p = 0.019), and shortening of >1 cm for peri-implant fracture (aHR, 5.44; p = 0.001).
Conclusions: For older patients with subtrochanteric and reverse-oblique femoral fractures, the dual lag screw design of the IN nail was associated with a lower risk of mechanical failure compared with the single lag screw design of the GN nail.
Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2024 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: No external funding was received for this work. The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article ( http://links.lww.com/JBJS/I353 ).
References
-
- Walter N, Szymski D, Kurtz SM, Lowenberg DW, Alt V, Lau EC, Rupp M. Epidemiology and treatment of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly U.S. population. Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 5;13(1):12734.
-
- Lundy DW. Subtrochanteric femoral fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Nov;15(11):663-71.
-
- Sivakumar A, Thewlis D, Ladurner A, Edwards S, Rickman M. Proximal Femoral Nail Unlocked versus Locked (ProFNUL): a protocol for a multicentre, parallel-armed randomised controlled trial for the effect of femoral nail mode of lag screw locking and screw configuration in the treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 10;10(2):e032640.
-
- Smith & Nephew. TRIGEN InterTAN Intertrochanteric Antegrade Nail Surgical Technique. Accessed 2024 Sep 27. https://smith-nephew-delivery.stylelabs.cloud/api/public/content/d5561285040e43a19ca4ff2096213b81?v=77b03243&download=true
-
- Ruecker AH, Rupprecht M, Gruber M, Gebauer M, Barvencik F, Briem D, Rueger JM. The treatment of intertrochanteric fractures: results using an intramedullary nail with integrated cephalocervical screws and linear compression. J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Jan;23(1):22-30.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
