Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Dec;52(12):3000605241305360.
doi: 10.1177/03000605241305360.

Predicting apheresis yield and factors affecting peripheral blood stem cell harvesting using a machine learning model

Affiliations

Predicting apheresis yield and factors affecting peripheral blood stem cell harvesting using a machine learning model

Jing Qi et al. J Int Med Res. 2024 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: Mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) are time-intensive and costly. Excessive apheresis sessions can cause physical discomfort for donors and increase the costs associated with collection. Therefore, it is essential to identify key predictive factors for successful harvests to minimize the need for multiple apheresis procedures.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 88 PBSC donations at our hospital. Mobilization involved disease-specific chemotherapy plus human recombinant granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; lenograstim) or G-CSF alone for 5 days, followed by apheresis on day 5. The baseline characteristics of donors, pre-apheresis complete blood counts, and CD34+ cells were evaluated. Univariate logistic regression, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithm, and multivariate logistic regression were applied to select significant predictive variables. The multivariate logistic regression results were integrated into various machine learning models to assess predictive accuracy.

Results: The percentage of pre-collection monocytes (Mono%), age, and CD34+ cell percentage (CD34+ cell%) were identified as significant independent factors that could accurately predict the success of an initial PBSC harvest.

Conclusions: We used machine learning methods to identify and validate Mono%, age, and CD34+ cell% as significant factors predictive of successful PBSC harvest on the first attempt, offering important insight to guide the clinical harvesting of PBSCs.

Keywords: Peripheral blood stem cell; apheresis; logistic regression; machine learning model; mobilization; prediction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interestThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Identification of important factors influencing success of initial PBSC collection using the XGBoost Algorithm. (a) Mono%, age, and CD34+ cell% emerged as the three leading variables in terms of importance and (b) results of the confusion matrix suggested that the three leading variables selected using XGBoost can effectively differentiate between positive and negative outcomes of the first PBSC collection. XGBoost, eXtreme Gradient Boosting; PBSC, peripheral blood stem cells; Mono%, percentage of pre-collection monocytes; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; WBC, white blood cells; BMI, body mass index; HGB, hemoglobin; PLT, platelets.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Machine learning models to validate the accuracy of independent factors in predicting successful PBSC collection. (a) Accuracy values obtained from the 30 leading cases predicted using Mono%, age, and CD34+ cell% with multiple algorithm combinations are presented in the bar plot. (b) ROC curve showing the predictive ability of the GBM model in the training set and (c) ROC curve showing the predictive ability of the GBM model in the test set. PBSC, peripheral blood stem cells; Mono%, percentage of pre-collection monocytes; GBM, ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the ROC curve; KNN, K-nearest neighbor; LR, logistic regression; RR, ridge regression; ENR, elastic net regression.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Passweg JF, et al.. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies in Europe. Leukemia 2003; 17: 941–959. - PubMed
    1. Holtick U, Albrecht M, Chemnitz JM, et al.. Comparison of bone marrow versus peripheral blood allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for hematological malignancies in adults—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2015; 94: 179–188. - PubMed
    1. Haspel RL, Miller KB. Hematopoietic stem cells: source matters. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther 2008; 3: 229–236. - PubMed
    1. Körbling M, Anderlini P. Peripheral blood stem cell versus bone marrow allotransplantation: does the source of hematopoietic stem cells matter? Blood 2001; 98: 2900–2908. - PubMed
    1. Hopman RK, DiPersio JF. Advances in stem cell mobilization. Blood Rev 2014; 28: 31–40. - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources